SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 156:
Line 156: + + + + + + + + + + + +
→re: deleting historic pages: new section
:Oh, thank you for expanding my abilities. Of course I will delete the old user pages.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 15:28, 26 August 2014 (EDT)
:Oh, thank you for expanding my abilities. Of course I will delete the old user pages.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 15:28, 26 August 2014 (EDT)
== re: deleting historic pages ==
Let me see if I've got this: You '''deleted the user and talk pages of renowned sysops, who were almost-founding-members, Crocoite/DeanS and MountainDew/DanH?''' (Well, Crocoite/DeanS was done, at your request, by someone else, before you got delete rights.) In case you're wondering, the "first-name-and-last-initial" rule was not enforced in the early days, so people could choose handles like Crocoite and MountainDew. When the rules started to be enforced, these people changed their names so they wouldn't be guilty of hypocrisy when they blocked people.
What next? Deleting all the [http://www.conservapedia.com/Category:Conservapedia_Contest contest] pages? They no longer make much sense when it isn't possible to see who those people were. Math articles? They've been a disaster for years, and no one works on them. Same for physics and chemistry. (Except relativity, of course :-)
Please do not aid, abet, enable, or do the bidding of people who are engaged in questionable and possibly destructive activities. These people (Cons and Andy) ''are perfectly capable of deleting pages themselves'', and they have enough historical perspective to know what they are doing. With all due respect, you do not. You do not have a good feel for which users were unimportant.
There are plenty of other, constructive, things you can do, and you have been doing them. Please continue with that.
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 00:01, 28 August 2014 (EDT)