Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,638
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Atheism and naturalistic intelligence (view source)
Revision as of 09:39, September 20, 2014
, 09:39, September 20, 2014no edit summary
Atheists rarely point out that the [[scientific revolution]] was birthed in a Christianized Europe (see: [[Christianity and science]]). Also, given that atheists/evolutionists actively discriminate against creationist and religious conservatives in academia and other places, atheists pointing out a higher prevalence of atheists relative to their numbers belonging to high profile scientific organizations or being awarded various distinctions is disingenuous (see: [[Suppression of alternatives to evolution]] and [[Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed]]).<ref>
*[http://usstore.creation.com/catalog/slaughter-dissidents-p-963.html?osCsid=r7q42h4vvqrfp5ob05tnco37r3 Slaughter of the dissidents]
*[http://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2013/06/10/suspicions-confirmed-academia-shutting-out-conservative-professors-n1616406/page/full Suspicions confirmed, conservatives being shut out of academia]
*[http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-chapter-1-evolution-creation-science-religion-facts-bias Refuting Evolution Evolution & creation, science & religion, facts & bias, First published in Refuting Evolution, Chapter 1]
*[http://creation.com/the-not-so-nobel-decision-raymond-damadian-mri The not-so-Nobel decision]
*[http://creation.com/dr-damadians-vital-contribution-to-mri-nobel-prize-controversy-returns Dr Damadian’s vital contribution to MRI: Nobel prize controversy returns]</ref>
In addition, there is a significant segment of atheists who engage in the erroneous ideologies/worldviews of [[scientism]], nature worship and neo-paganism so a certain degree of preoccupation/obsession with [[pseudoscience]], [[Naturalism (philosophy)|naturalistic philosophy]] and scientific endeavors is not surprising within some members of the atheist community.<ref>[http://creation.com/atheism#atheism-neopaganism Atheism as nature worship or neo-paganism]</ref> See also: [[Irreligion and superstition]] and [[Evolution as a secular origins myth]] and [[Evolution and Cases of Fraud, Hoaxes and Speculation]]
As far as atheists in the scientific community, Vox Day correctly points out that many atheist scientists (and scientists in general) have a poor grasp of logic, statistics, the history/philosophy of science and other matters which often causes them to reach erroneous conclusions and engage in pseudoscience.<ref>
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2011/08/lecturing-butterfly-collector.html Correcting the butterfly collector]
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2009/06/frauds-of-science-ii.html The frauds of science II]
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2010/07/why-scientific-evidence-is-less-valid.html Why scientific evidence is less valid in law]
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2008/01/atheist-morality-and-iq-in-action.html TIA review aka Atheism in Action]
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2011/07/its-not-all-nails.html It's not all nails]
*[http://voxday.blogspot.ca/2014/02/statistical-misleadings.html Statistical misleadings]</ref> Moreover, due to the poor ethics of many atheist/secular scientists, scientific fraud has become a significant problem within the scientific community.<ref>[http://creation.com/science-fraud-epidemic http://creation.com/science-fraud-epidemic Scientific fraud epidemic]</ref><ref>[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2009/03/if-you-hand-us-hammer.html If you hand us a hammer]</ref>
At the present time, there is a reluctance of many prominent [[evolution]]ists/atheists/agnostics to debate key points of their errant ideologies (see: [[Creation scientists tend to win the creation vs. evolution debates]] and [[Atheism and cowardice]]). For example, the agnostic [[Richard Dawkins]] has repeatedly refused to debate strong Christian debaters concerning the existence of God and he has repeatedly refused to debate [[creation science|creation scientists]] and [[intelligent design]] theorists (see: [[Instances of Richard Dawkins ducking debates]]). In addition, when atheists/agnostics do debate the issue of the existence of God, they typically do poorly (see: [[Atheism and debate]]).
For more information, please see: [[Atheism and the suppression of science]]
== See also ==
== See also ==