Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
4 bytes added ,  07:39, September 23, 2014
Line 19: Line 19:  
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2014/08/lamarck-lives.html Lamarck lives!] by [[Vox Day]], August 16, 2014
 
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2014/08/lamarck-lives.html Lamarck lives!] by [[Vox Day]], August 16, 2014
 
*[http://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/mar/19/evolution-darwin-natural-selection-genes-wrong Why everything you've been told about evolution is wrong] by Oliver Burkeman, ''The Guardian'', March 18, 2010 (pro-evolution)
 
*[http://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/mar/19/evolution-darwin-natural-selection-genes-wrong Why everything you've been told about evolution is wrong] by Oliver Burkeman, ''The Guardian'', March 18, 2010 (pro-evolution)
−
*[http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22029461.700-mouse-memory-inheritance-may-revitalise-lamarckism.html Mouse memory inheritance may revitalise Lamarckism], New Scientist, December 4, 2013
+
*[http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22029461.700-mouse-memory-inheritance-may-revitalise-lamarckism.html Mouse memory inheritance may revitalise Lamarckism], ''New Scientist'', December 4, 2013
    
However, due to intellectual inertia, and evolutionary indoctrination of students into neo-darwinism and people's natural tendency to resist change, the neo-darwinian school of evolutionary thought is still dominant (see also: [[Paradigm|Paradigm shift]]). The weight of evidence still supports the biblical [[creation]] model (see also: [[Creation science]]).
 
However, due to intellectual inertia, and evolutionary indoctrination of students into neo-darwinism and people's natural tendency to resist change, the neo-darwinian school of evolutionary thought is still dominant (see also: [[Paradigm|Paradigm shift]]). The weight of evidence still supports the biblical [[creation]] model (see also: [[Creation science]]).
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,718

edits

Navigation menu