Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,925
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 252:
Line 252: − − [[File:Hemant Mehta.jpg|thumbnail|right|225px|[[Hemant Menta]] <br /><br /> − <small>(photo obtained from [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hemant_Mehta.jpg Wikimedia Commons], see: [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en license agreement])</small>]]
Atheist hypocrisy (view source)
Revision as of 12:21, September 25, 2014
, 12:21, September 25, 2014→Denial of objective beauty
Atheists/evolutionists often engage in hypocrisy on the issue of [[beauty]] in God's universe and engage in self-refuting arguments which argue that beauty is merely subjective, yet non-beauty/ugliness is an objective reality (non-beauty arose after the [[fall of man]]).<ref>[http://www.everyjoe.com/2014/07/03/politics/robbed-of-beauty-by-the-left/ How We’ve Been Robbed of Beauty by the Left]</ref><ref>[http://www.quodlibet.net/articles/williams-aesthetic.shtml Aesthetic arguments for the existence of God] by Peter Williams</ref><ref>[http://creation.com/darwins-arguments-against-god Darwin's arguments against God]</ref> See: [[Argument from beauty]]
Atheists/evolutionists often engage in hypocrisy on the issue of [[beauty]] in God's universe and engage in self-refuting arguments which argue that beauty is merely subjective, yet non-beauty/ugliness is an objective reality (non-beauty arose after the [[fall of man]]).<ref>[http://www.everyjoe.com/2014/07/03/politics/robbed-of-beauty-by-the-left/ How We’ve Been Robbed of Beauty by the Left]</ref><ref>[http://www.quodlibet.net/articles/williams-aesthetic.shtml Aesthetic arguments for the existence of God] by Peter Williams</ref><ref>[http://creation.com/darwins-arguments-against-god Darwin's arguments against God]</ref> See: [[Argument from beauty]]
== Hermant Mehta and his endorsement of the Brights Movement ==
== Hermant Mehta and his endorsement of the Brights Movement ==