Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,621
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 34:
Line 34: − − For more information, please see: [[Atheism and the suppression of science]]
Atheism and naturalistic intelligence (view source)
Revision as of 14:58, September 25, 2014
, 14:58, September 25, 2014→Reluctance of evolutionists to debate and past debate record
At the present time, there is a reluctance of many prominent [[evolution]]ists/atheists/agnostics to debate key points of their errant ideologies (see: [[Creation scientists tend to win the creation vs. evolution debates]] and [[Atheism and cowardice]]). For example, the agnostic [[Richard Dawkins]] has repeatedly refused to debate strong Christian debaters concerning the existence of God and he has repeatedly refused to debate [[creation science|creation scientists]] and [[intelligent design]] theorists (see: [[Instances of Richard Dawkins ducking debates]]). In addition, when atheists/agnostics do debate the issue of the existence of God, they typically do poorly (see: [[Atheism and debate]]).
At the present time, there is a reluctance of many prominent [[evolution]]ists/atheists/agnostics to debate key points of their errant ideologies (see: [[Creation scientists tend to win the creation vs. evolution debates]] and [[Atheism and cowardice]]). For example, the agnostic [[Richard Dawkins]] has repeatedly refused to debate strong Christian debaters concerning the existence of God and he has repeatedly refused to debate [[creation science|creation scientists]] and [[intelligent design]] theorists (see: [[Instances of Richard Dawkins ducking debates]]). In addition, when atheists/agnostics do debate the issue of the existence of God, they typically do poorly (see: [[Atheism and debate]]).
== See also ==
== See also ==