Changes

Atheists commonly use logical fallacies in their arguments.<ref>[http://atheism-analyzed.blogspot.com/2011/12/ten-fallacies-of-atheism.html Ten fallacies of atheism]</ref>   

Atheists commonly use logical fallacies in their arguments.<ref>[http://atheism-analyzed.blogspot.com/2011/12/ten-fallacies-of-atheism.html Ten fallacies of atheism]</ref>   

One of the most common [[logical fallacy|logical fallacies]] they employ is the [[fallacy of exclusion]].  For example, the [[evolution]]ist Dr. Scott Todd, an immunologist at [[Kansas State University]], wrote: "Even if all the data point to an [[Intelligent design|intelligent designer]], such an hypothesis is excluded from science because it is not [[naturalism|naturalistic]]".<ref>http://creation.com/a-designer-is-unscientificeven-if-all-the-evidence-supports-one</ref> See also: [[Methodological naturalism]]

One of the most common [[logical fallacy|logical fallacies]] atheist, [[agnosticism|agnostics]] and [[evolution]]ists employ is the [[fallacy of exclusion]].  For example, the [[evolution]]ist Dr. Scott Todd, an immunologist at [[Kansas State University]], wrote: "Even if all the data point to an [[Intelligent design|intelligent designer]], such an hypothesis is excluded from science because it is not [[naturalism|naturalistic]]".<ref>http://creation.com/a-designer-is-unscientificeven-if-all-the-evidence-supports-one</ref> See also: [[Methodological naturalism]]

== Irrationality of the atheism and the logic of theism/creation ==

== Irrationality of the atheism and the logic of theism/creation ==