4,994
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 106:
Line 106: + + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 11:55, January 20, 2007
, 11:55, January 20, 2007→Beating Out Wackypedia
:Well, you already have more articles than [http://sco.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page the Scots Wikipedia], anyway. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 19:58, 19 January 2007 (EST)
:Well, you already have more articles than [http://sco.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page the Scots Wikipedia], anyway. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 19:58, 19 January 2007 (EST)
:Another thought:
::Do you expect the growth of a project like Wikipedia or Conservapedia to occur at a constant rate? ("274 articles per day for 10 years?") Or do you expect it to be an example of a [[geometric progression]]?
::If Conservapedia has 3,000 articles and grows at 70 articles per day, that means that it grows by 2.3% every day. I don't think it will really keep doing this, but let's suppose it did. My calculations show that 1.023<sup>31</sup>, that is 1.023 multiplied by itself thirty-one times, is 2.02. That means that the number of articles would double every month.
::'''If''' the number of articles in Conservapedia were to double every month, how long would it take to reach a million? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:55, 20 January 2007 (EST)