111
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 39:
Line 39: + + + +
Talk:Essay:Rebuttal to Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)
Revision as of 07:01, October 14, 2014
, 07:01, October 14, 2014→Aristotle and Motion: new section
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:12, 16 March 2012 (EDT)
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:12, 16 March 2012 (EDT)
:This is a bit odd. CP has an essay, largely written by Aschlafly, entitled "Counterexamples to Relativity." Presumably he states his best affirmative case there. CP also has this essay, entitled "Rebuttal to Counterexamples to Relativity" largely written by people who disagree with the first essay. So, in 2012, Aschlafly adds signed comments to the rebuttal page, agreed to stop and his signed comments were moved to this page. Now, in 2014, Aschlafly again leaves signed comments in the essay saying that he disagrees with the rebuttals as a matter of mathematical truth.[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Rebuttal_to_Counterexamples_to_Relativity&diff=prev&oldid=1072800][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Rebuttal_to_Counterexamples_to_Relativity&diff=prev&oldid=1072803] The math behind both quantum mechanics and relativity is very difficult and subject to interpretation. It is not as clear as 2+2=4. I would suggest that Aschlafly make the original essay as clear and compelling as possible and that SamHB make the rebuttal essay as clear and compelling as possible, and that we trust the readers to understand that the authors disagree with each other without adding comments to the individual essay points repeating the fact of disagreement. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 07:22, 7 January 2014 (EST)
:This is a bit odd. CP has an essay, largely written by Aschlafly, entitled "Counterexamples to Relativity." Presumably he states his best affirmative case there. CP also has this essay, entitled "Rebuttal to Counterexamples to Relativity" largely written by people who disagree with the first essay. So, in 2012, Aschlafly adds signed comments to the rebuttal page, agreed to stop and his signed comments were moved to this page. Now, in 2014, Aschlafly again leaves signed comments in the essay saying that he disagrees with the rebuttals as a matter of mathematical truth.[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Rebuttal_to_Counterexamples_to_Relativity&diff=prev&oldid=1072800][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Rebuttal_to_Counterexamples_to_Relativity&diff=prev&oldid=1072803] The math behind both quantum mechanics and relativity is very difficult and subject to interpretation. It is not as clear as 2+2=4. I would suggest that Aschlafly make the original essay as clear and compelling as possible and that SamHB make the rebuttal essay as clear and compelling as possible, and that we trust the readers to understand that the authors disagree with each other without adding comments to the individual essay points repeating the fact of disagreement. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 07:22, 7 January 2014 (EST)
== Aristotle and Motion ==
[http://dhspriory.org/thomas/Physics4.htm#8 In Book 4, Chapter 8 of Physics], Aristotle taught that "We see that bodies which have a greater impulse either of weight or of lightness, if they are alike in other respects, move faster over an equal space, and in the ratio which their magnitudes bear to each other. Therefore they will also move through the void with this ratio of speed." [[User:MelH|MelH]] 03:01, 14 October 2014 (EDT)