Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,972
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 118:
Line 118: + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→Frank Zindler Versus Dr. William Craig Debate
A leading light in the [[American Atheists]]. Isn’t it amazing how so many atheists love [[Theory of evolution|evolution]] and appear to be threatened by the massive scientific evidence for [[Creation Science|creation]]? Zindler took the atheism side in an Atheism v. Christianity debate in front of 7,500 people at Willow Creek Community Church, USA. His opponent, Dr William Lane Craig, tore his ignorant arguments to shreds so effectively that many atheists in the audience realised that Zindler had lost the debate. It was presumably to this debate that John Snowden was alluding when he wrote that a representative of the American Atheists, whom he used to support, lost a public debate to a “fundamentalist” (Skeptic 18(3), 1998).<ref>http://www.trueorigin.org/noaig.asp</ref>}}
A leading light in the [[American Atheists]]. Isn’t it amazing how so many atheists love [[Theory of evolution|evolution]] and appear to be threatened by the massive scientific evidence for [[Creation Science|creation]]? Zindler took the atheism side in an Atheism v. Christianity debate in front of 7,500 people at Willow Creek Community Church, USA. His opponent, Dr William Lane Craig, tore his ignorant arguments to shreds so effectively that many atheists in the audience realised that Zindler had lost the debate. It was presumably to this debate that John Snowden was alluding when he wrote that a representative of the American Atheists, whom he used to support, lost a public debate to a “fundamentalist” (Skeptic 18(3), 1998).<ref>http://www.trueorigin.org/noaig.asp</ref>}}
==Madalyn Murray O'Hair debate with Dr. Walter Martin ==
''See also:'' [[Atheism and debate]]
[[File:Frank Zindler.jpg|thumbnail|220px|right|The website [[TrueOrigin]] wrote concerning the [[William Lane Craig]] vs. [[Frank Zindler]] debate: "Dr. [[William Lane Craig]], tore his ignorant arguments to shreds so effectively that many atheists in the audience realised that Zindler had lost the debate. It was presumably to this debate that John Snowden was alluding when he wrote that a representative of the American Atheists, whom he used to support, lost a public debate to a “fundamentalist” (Skeptic 18(3), 1998)." <ref>http://www.trueorigin.org/noaig.asp</ref>
<br />
<br />
<small>(photo obtained from [http://www.flickr.com/photos/martystone/3435210822/ Flickr], see [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en license agreement])</small> ]]
Madalyn Murray O'Hair did particularly badly in her debate with Dr. [[Walter Martin]].<ref>
http://defendingcontending.com/2009/01/01/debate-walter-martin-vs-madalyn-murray-ohair/</ref> For example, when she claimed [[Atheism and the Bible|there were supposedly were contradictions in the Bible]], Dr. Martin asked her to provide an example of one and Ms. O'Hair did not and could not offer even an alleged example of a Bible contradiction.<ref>
http://defendingcontending.com/2009/01/01/debate-walter-martin-vs-madalyn-murray-ohair/</ref> In addition, Ms. O'Hair was ill prepared in terms of defending against the issue of [[Atheism and mass murder|atheism and mass murder]].<ref>
http://defendingcontending.com/2009/01/01/debate-walter-martin-vs-madalyn-murray-ohair/</ref>
== 2009 origin of life debate ==
== 2009 origin of life debate ==