→Definition: you can stop embarassing yourself anytime now
Line 68:
Line 68:
:::Perhaps you could be kind enough to show me where edits such as "leftists are for what's beneficial to humanity" or "liberals are broadminded" have occured on Conservapedia, unencyclopedic as they are.
:::Perhaps you could be kind enough to show me where edits such as "leftists are for what's beneficial to humanity" or "liberals are broadminded" have occured on Conservapedia, unencyclopedic as they are.
:::[[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] 15:37, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
:::[[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] 15:37, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
+
+
::::So one of these cites says, "''reduce or eliminate these inequalities.... Common political paths include socialism , [[communism]]'''". Can we factually say [[Cuba]] has failed in this regard?
+
::::*''The article [[Political spectrum]] seems to manage much better, edits being well sourced, the only exceptions your own''
+
::::ahhhh, those well sourced edits at [[Political spectrum]] were all added by me [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Political_spectrum&diff=prev&oldid=103102][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Political_spectrum&diff=next&oldid=103136], and 90% of the article, as it is now, was written by me. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Political_spectrum&diff=105654&oldid=95884]
+
::::Care to stop embarassing yourself before engaging in any further personal attacks? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:51, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
+
+
::I fear [[User:RobS|RobS]] believes they (communism, socialism, social democracy and so on) are all part of the same conspiracy.[[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] 14:21, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
::I fear [[User:RobS|RobS]] believes they (communism, socialism, social democracy and so on) are all part of the same conspiracy.[[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] 14:21, 16 April 2007 (EDT)