nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 186:
Line 186: + + + + + + +
→Templates: Possible culling required
::Indeed. If very young, all topics of interest to them, eh? We have many very young users, and they are indeed pop culture icons, no? Like I said, I agree with most of the above. Judicious pruning never hurts as well! --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 15:44, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
::Indeed. If very young, all topics of interest to them, eh? We have many very young users, and they are indeed pop culture icons, no? Like I said, I agree with most of the above. Judicious pruning never hurts as well! --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 15:44, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
== Templates ==
I've created a [[help:Templates|page listing all Conservapedia's templates]] as a ready reference for editors wanting to know what templates are available and what they are for. It is very rough and ready and the page could do with some improvement, but my main concern at the moment is that there are a number of templates in existence that are likely against the rules and/or guidelines, or which we don't want to encourage people to use.
Could sysops (or others) have a look through the list and cull out (of existence, not just from the page) any templates that we should not have. Now that I've created the page it should be easier than before to see what's there and take action accordingly.
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 18:55, 16 April 2007 (EDT)