Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 17: Line 17:     
'''Delete.'''  This article is trash.  '''Exotheology''' probably doesn't deserve an article.  '''Exobiology''' certainly deserves a better one.  [[User:Ga ohoyt|Ga ohoyt]] 17:32, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
 
'''Delete.'''  This article is trash.  '''Exotheology''' probably doesn't deserve an article.  '''Exobiology''' certainly deserves a better one.  [[User:Ga ohoyt|Ga ohoyt]] 17:32, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
'''Delete,''' or at least fix it. Very little of the article actually addresses the stated subject, which is a form of speculative philosophy, not a science (or pseudoscience). The sources are also kind of lacking.  I found a few hits for exotheology through Google and Google Scholar. There's a fair amount of popular information on exotheology, and journal articles by Hoffman and Haught. It shouldn't be hard to write a good exo-t. article. But I wouldn't want to use this as a starting point.--[[User:All Fish Welcome|All Fish Welcome]] 19:03, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
    
== Keep ==
 
== Keep ==

Navigation menu