Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Mainpageleft (view source)

Revision as of 14:36, November 5, 2014

1 byte added ,  14:36, November 5, 2014
m
→‎Conservapedia proven right, again: punctuation
Line 14: Line 14:  
''Washington Post'' on November 5, 2014: "Yes, this is a GOP wave election."[http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/11/04/yes-this-is-a-gop-wave-election/]  
 
''Washington Post'' on November 5, 2014: "Yes, this is a GOP wave election."[http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/11/04/yes-this-is-a-gop-wave-election/]  
   −
''The Fiscal Times'' on October 23, 2014: "Why a GOP Wave Election Will Surprise the Media".[http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2014/10/23/Why-GOP-Wave-Election-Will-Surprise-Media]
+
''The Fiscal Times'' on October 23, 2014: "Why a GOP Wave Election Will Surprise the Media." [http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2014/10/23/Why-GOP-Wave-Election-Will-Surprise-Media]
    
Why did the clueless, lamestream media fail to predict the [[Republican]] wave election or even widely and in-depth discuss the likelihood of it?  Liberal incompetence? Shielding [[Obama]]?
 
Why did the clueless, lamestream media fail to predict the [[Republican]] wave election or even widely and in-depth discuss the likelihood of it?  Liberal incompetence? Shielding [[Obama]]?
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,667

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1116136"

Navigation menu