Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Withdrawal of jurisdiction (view source)

Revision as of 22:45, November 7, 2014

160 bytes added ,  22:45, November 7, 2014
→‎Other Withdrawals of Jurisdiction
Line 43: Line 43:  
:(ii) any claim relating to any act or omission of such institution or the Corporation as receiver." (12 U.S.C. § 1821(d)(13)(D) (Supp. II 1990).)
 
:(ii) any claim relating to any act or omission of such institution or the Corporation as receiver." (12 U.S.C. § 1821(d)(13)(D) (Supp. II 1990).)
   −
The RTC argues that section 1821(d)(13)(D) acts as a jurisdictional bar which precludes any judicial action until [***8]  a claimant has exhausted the administrative claims process.
+
The RTC argues that section 1821(d)(13)(D) acts as a jurisdictional bar which precludes any judicial action until a claimant has exhausted the administrative claims process.
   −
Not all state courts have agreed with this withdrawal of jurisdiction.  See, e.g., Armstrong v. Resolution Trust Corp., 157 Ill. 2d 49 (1993).
+
Not all state courts have agreed with this withdrawal of jurisdiction.  See, e.g., ''Armstrong v. Resolution Trust Corp.'', 157 Ill. 2d 49 (1993).
 +
 
 +
Jurisdiction has been withdrawn from courts over many orders of removal of aliens, by 8 U.S. Code § 1252.<ref>http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1252</ref>
    
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,425

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1116648"

Navigation menu