| − | The actual thought experiment aiming to resolve this question consist in imagination of group of people, a pattern subject of research, that would consider for normal and normative only the [[homosexual]] behavior. If such norm would be applied onto all members of the tested group, so that all of them would be "normalized" accordingly, the society that would adopt such twisted normative approach would simply die out or depend on unnatural methods of [[reproduction]]. The result of this [[experiment]] is predictable with absolute degree of certainty beyond any doubt. Therefore, the conclusive statement inevitably must be that not only the homosexual relationships do not secure the integrity of the society, but also act in counter-direction, endanger its very existence and disintegrate it. In order to maintain the sustainability of society, they must be left devoid of legal support with respect to any form of marriage, i.e. institution arranging i.a. the sexual relationships of humans. | + | The actual thought experiment aiming to resolve this question consists in imagining the group of people, a pattern subject of research, that would consider as normal and normative solely the [[homosexual]] behavior. If such norm would be applied onto all members of the tested group, so that all of them would be "normalized" accordingly, the society that would adopt such twisted normative approach would simply die out or depend on unnatural methods of [[reproduction]]. The result of this [[experiment]] is predictable with absolute degree of certainty beyond any doubt. Therefore, the conclusive statement inevitably must be that not only the homosexual relationships do not secure the integrity of the society, but also act in counter-direction, endanger its very existence and disintegrate it. In order to maintain the sustainability of society, they must be left devoid of legal support with respect to any form of marriage, i.e. institution arranging i.a. the sexual relationships of humans. |