188
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: + +
Conservapedia:AFD Exotheology (view source)
Revision as of 23:38, April 16, 2007
, 23:38, April 16, 2007no edit summary
'''Delete,''' or at least fix it. Very little of the article actually addresses the stated subject, which is a form of speculative philosophy, not a science (or pseudoscience). The sources are also kind of lacking. I found a few hits for exotheology through Google and Google Scholar. There's a fair amount of popular information on exotheology, and journal articles by Hoffman and Haught. It shouldn't be hard to write a good exo-t. article. But I wouldn't want to use this as a starting point.--[[User:All Fish Welcome|All Fish Welcome]] 19:03, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
'''Delete,''' or at least fix it. Very little of the article actually addresses the stated subject, which is a form of speculative philosophy, not a science (or pseudoscience). The sources are also kind of lacking. I found a few hits for exotheology through Google and Google Scholar. There's a fair amount of popular information on exotheology, and journal articles by Hoffman and Haught. It shouldn't be hard to write a good exo-t. article. But I wouldn't want to use this as a starting point.--[[User:All Fish Welcome|All Fish Welcome]] 19:03, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
'''Delete,''' article dosnt even define what exotheology is, it allso contains some claims which the citations dont confirm, for example the last one about most scientists doubting existence of life outside earth. Allmost nothing on this article has anything to do with the topic. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 19:38, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
== Keep ==
== Keep ==