1,660
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 185:
Line 185: + + +
no edit summary
I would like to know on what basis the Breast Cancer Institute and the National Cancer Society are deemed to be 'politicized' when they state unequivocally that there is no proven link between abortion and breast cancer. As it stands, this article is dishonest in making the claim that a proven link exists. I note that there is no citation in support of this.--[[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 17:30, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
I would like to know on what basis the Breast Cancer Institute and the National Cancer Society are deemed to be 'politicized' when they state unequivocally that there is no proven link between abortion and breast cancer. As it stands, this article is dishonest in making the claim that a proven link exists. I note that there is no citation in support of this.--[[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 17:30, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
==Danger/Boycott==
Well, I'm still keeping my hands off this article, and my edits out. It is obviously so politicized that it is absurd. Breast cancer is one of the most important health problems in this country. Abortion is one of the most important moral discussions in this country. They happen to be '''medically unrelated'''. I certainly hope people who read the current article do not rely on it for accurate information on breast cancer. I mean this not just because of the "abortion issue" but also because, as long as it remains politicized, no real medical expert will put their name to it and help keep the article otherwise accurate. And before you accuse me of one of those ridiculous 90/10 violations, check my recent contributions.[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 20:44, 16 April 2007 (EDT)