Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
324 bytes added ,  02:31, April 17, 2007
Line 39: Line 39:     
'''Question''': what happens if the murderer hadn't been able to get a gun?  '''Answer''': there would be ''many'' less people dead then there are now. -'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:25, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
 
'''Question''': what happens if the murderer hadn't been able to get a gun?  '''Answer''': there would be ''many'' less people dead then there are now. -'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:25, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::'''Reply''' Regardless of what the laws are a criminal who wants a gun will be able to get one.  Look an how effective (not very) the laws against illegal drugs are.  gun control takes the guns out of the hands of the law abiding citizens but not the criminals. --[[User:CPAdmin1|CPAdmin1]] 22:31, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
    
::::Well they have so-called "motor-voter" laws that enable people who get driver's licenses to register to vote.<br>Perhaps they could draft a "motor-toter" law, to issue every driver a handgun? Carjackings would go WAY down.[[User:Rob Pommer| Rob Pommer]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub>
 
::::Well they have so-called "motor-voter" laws that enable people who get driver's licenses to register to vote.<br>Perhaps they could draft a "motor-toter" law, to issue every driver a handgun? Carjackings would go WAY down.[[User:Rob Pommer| Rob Pommer]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub>
    
:::::More likely he would use some other weapon to kill.  Like run over someone with his car.[[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 22:30, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:::::More likely he would use some other weapon to kill.  Like run over someone with his car.[[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 22:30, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
2,144

edits

Navigation menu