Changes

[[File:Question-Evolution-Campaign.jpg|thumbnail|250px|right|The [[Question evolution! campaign]] by [[Creation Ministries International]] is a worldwide campaign which poses 15 questions that evolutionists cannot satisfactorily answer.<ref>[http://creation.com/question-evolution Question evolution! campaign] by [[Creation Ministries International]]</ref> The 15 questions posed to evolutionists can be found [http://creation.com/15-questions HERE] ]]

[[File:Question-Evolution-Campaign.jpg|thumbnail|250px|right|The [[Question evolution! campaign]] by [[Creation Ministries International]] is a worldwide campaign which poses 15 questions that evolutionists cannot satisfactorily answer.<ref>[http://creation.com/question-evolution Question evolution! campaign] by [[Creation Ministries International]]</ref> The 15 questions posed to evolutionists can be found [http://creation.com/15-questions HERE] ]]

The [[theory of evolution]] does not permit the existence of any counterexamples.  '''If any one of the 49 counterexamples listed below is correct, then the theory of evolution fails'''. Conservapedia, however, does not understand the concept that theories can be changed; after all, it's just a '''''theory'''''. If Rick Perry forgets, even once, one of the agencies of government he wishes to cut, he is therefore not fit for the presidency. See? Moreover, even if there is merely a 5% chance that each of these counterexamples is correct (and the odds are far higher than that<ref>Many of the counterexamples are indisputable, rendering each of their probabilities of being correct nearly 100%.</ref>), then the probability that the theory of evolution is true is less than 9%. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_probability]

The [[theory of evolution]] does not permit the existence of any counterexamples.  '''If any one of the 49 counterexamples listed below is correct, then the theory of evolution fails'''. Moreover, even if there is merely a 2% chance that each of these counterexamples is correct (and the odds are far higher than that<ref>Many of the counterexamples are indisputable, rendering each of their probabilities of being correct nearly 100%.</ref>), then the probability that the theory of evolution is true is less than 2%.

==Counterexamples==

==Counterexamples==

===Logical examples===

===Logical examples===

# Evolution cannot explain artistic beauty, such as brilliant autumn foliage and the staggering array of beautiful marine fish, both of which originated before any human to view them; this lacks any plausible evolutionary explanation. Conservapedia cannot explain that there are people who see beauty differently from others. but da nazi arien rice es buutifuul.

# Evolution cannot explain artistic beauty, such as brilliant autumn foliage and the staggering array of beautiful marine fish, both of which originated before any human to view them; this lacks any plausible evolutionary explanation. Moreover, some non-creationists claim that beauty is only in the eye of the beholder, that is, beauty is a human concept. This is not true because many animals, such as elephants, have been seen to respect beauty (albeit in their own way).

# Evolution predicts that human intelligence should increase over time, when in fact all evidence is that it is decreasing:  declining SAT scores, shortening attention spans, and increasing mental problems. Signs that Conservapedia, made in the last decade, should not exist.

# Evolution predicts that human intelligence should increase over time, when in fact all evidence is that it is decreasing:  declining SAT scores, shortening attention spans, and increasing mental problems.

# The current annual rate of extinction of species far exceeds any plausible rate of generation of species. Maybe it might just be because of global warming. Expanding the amount of time for evolution to occur makes evolution even less likely.

# The current annual rate of extinction of species far exceeds any plausible rate of generation of species. Maybe it might just be because of global warming. Expanding the amount of time for evolution to occur makes evolution even less likely. Also, if global warming is man made, then the earth should've supposedly been cooler millions of  ago. Cold enough that animals cold not have survived. Therefore, either evolution or global warming must be false (or both, which is the most logical scenario).  

# The [[Second Law of Thermodynamics]] establishes that everything in the world becomes more disordered over time, in the absence of intelligent intervention; the theory of evolution falsely claims that some systems can become more ordered, like an impossible [[perpetual motion machine]].

# The [[Second Law of Thermodynamics]] establishes that everything in the world becomes more disordered over time, in the absence of intelligent intervention; the theory of evolution falsely claims that some systems can become more ordered, like an impossible [[perpetual motion machine]].

# The [[Law of Large Numbers]] states that things tend to revert to their average over time (the large number of examples), while evolution requires the opposite:  that things become more complex and depart further from their average over time and large numbers of examples.

# The [[Law of Large Numbers]] states that things tend to revert to their average over time (the large number of examples), while evolution requires the opposite:  that things become more complex and depart further from their average over time and large numbers of examples.