29
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 358:
Line 358: + + + +
Talk:Conservapedia proven right (view source)
Revision as of 22:38, December 14, 2014
, 22:38, December 14, 2014→"There are no black holes": new section
::So a functioning definition of 'the best of the public' is anyone outside the top four recognized world experts in a particular field?--[[User:DHouser|DHouser]] 16:23, 16 July 2013 (EDT)
::So a functioning definition of 'the best of the public' is anyone outside the top four recognized world experts in a particular field?--[[User:DHouser|DHouser]] 16:23, 16 July 2013 (EDT)
== "There are no black holes" ==
This is sensationalist. “The absence of event horizons means that there are no black holes — in the sense of regimes from which light can't escape to infinity.” If Hawking is correct, then black holes still exist, just not in the way previously thought.