347
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: + + + + + + +
no edit summary
This, however, raises the question in many people's minds as to why God would allow evil things, knowing that they would arise.
This, however, raises the question in many people's minds as to why God would allow evil things, knowing that they would arise.
The problem with this question is that it assumes that God would not have had some purpose in allowing evil to arise.
The problem with this question is that it assumes that God would not have had some purpose in allowing evil to arise.
===Some other arguments against omniscience===
Philosopher Patrick Grim of SUNY Stoney Brook has argued that modern set theory disproves omniscience because there can be no single set of all truths. <ref>Moreland, J.P., Meister, Sweis, eds. ''Debating Christian Theism''. Oxford: OUP, 2013. Print. Pages 169-180.</ref>One way to answer this argument is by saying that God nature transcends logic and therefore, as difficult as it may be to comprehend for us, God is still omniscient and mathematical and logical laws do not apply to God.
==References==
<references>
[[category:theology]]
[[category:theology]]