Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 115: Line 115:     
* This argument fails to address [[gestalt consciousness]].
 
* This argument fails to address [[gestalt consciousness]].
−
* [[Evolutionists]] typically argue that consciousness may happen by chance, and that for this reason, the argument is invalid. However, this is highly illogical and unlikely, so is yet another weak argument for atheism.
+
* [[Evolutionists]] typically argue that consciousness may happen by chance. If this is the case, then the [[anthropic principle]] applies.
 
* Infinite regress is allowable both in modern mathematics and physics.
 
* Infinite regress is allowable both in modern mathematics and physics.
 
* The last point (that the uncaused causer is God) is unsupported unless it is taken as a statement of definition.  If this is the case, the prior arguments are unnecessary.
 
* The last point (that the uncaused causer is God) is unsupported unless it is taken as a statement of definition.  If this is the case, the prior arguments are unnecessary.
29

edits

Navigation menu