37
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: +
Category talk:Subtypes of Pitta (view source)
Revision as of 07:40, January 3, 2015
, 07:40, January 3, 2015no edit summary
: Nope. Thank you for bringing it to the Talk Page instead of deleting others content without discussion or understanding of the subject matter. Perhaps you might considering focusing on Australia article '''creation''' and other of your specialties rather than editing complementary medicine and medicine articles in which you are not a subject matter expert. I will focus on my areas of expertise until I am told to do otherwise by the Administrators of Conservapedia such as [[User:Conservative]] and [[User:Karajou]]. [[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 02:36, 3 January 2015 (EST)
: Nope. Thank you for bringing it to the Talk Page instead of deleting others content without discussion or understanding of the subject matter. Perhaps you might considering focusing on Australia article '''creation''' and other of your specialties rather than editing complementary medicine and medicine articles in which you are not a subject matter expert. I will focus on my areas of expertise until I am told to do otherwise by the Administrators of Conservapedia such as [[User:Conservative]] and [[User:Karajou]]. [[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 02:36, 3 January 2015 (EST)
:: I will however it is worth noting that the vast majority (99+%) would hold the same views on alternative medicine as I do. [[User:PhilH|PhilH]] 02:40, 3 January 2015 (EST)