Changes

I would like to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive252#Ban_proposal:_Kauffner appeal my ban of 23 August 2013]. I have [http://www.conservapedia.com/User:PeterKa/Arbcom a collection of supporting material], including my appeal from 2013 and testimonials from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bermicourt Bermicourt] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jenks24 Jenks24]. Jenks reviewed this document and suggested that I express my willingness to accept a diacritics topic ban, which I am willing to accept. At one point, I was one of the editors most eligible for adminship, according to a scoring matrix. Following a year-long campaign against me by several editors, I was blocked and banned. An article I wrote about Sino-Vietnamese characters was the catalyst. Other issues involved include Vietnamese diacritics and a [http://www.conservapedia.com/User:PeterKa/Filipacchi parody I wrote about the gender categories issue] (made famous by Amanda Filipacchi).

I would like to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive252#Ban_proposal:_Kauffner appeal my ban of 23 August 2013]. I have [http://www.conservapedia.com/User:PeterKa/Arbcom a collection of supporting material], including my appeal from 2013 and testimonials from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bermicourt Bermicourt] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jenks24 Jenks24]. Jenks reviewed this document and suggested that I express my willingness to accept a diacritics topic ban, which I am willing to accept. At one point, I was one of the editors most eligible for adminship, according to a scoring matrix. Following a year-long campaign against me by several editors, I was blocked and banned. An article I wrote about Sino-Vietnamese characters was the catalyst. Other issues involved include Vietnamese diacritics and a [http://www.conservapedia.com/User:PeterKa/Filipacchi parody I wrote about the gender categories issue] (made famous by Amanda Filipacchi).

*'''How it all started'''. On [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Scottywong/Admin_scoring_tool_results  Scottywong’s admin hopeful list] for 4 March 2013, I have a score of 320. This is after 500 points were deducted on account of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User%3AKauffner MSGJ’s block] of July 2012. If you add these points to my score, I am ranked No. 12 on the list. (In ictu oculi is No. 184.) Up until this block, I had a clean record going back eight years that included tens of thousands of constructive edits.

*'''How it all started'''. On [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Scottywong/Admin_scoring_tool_results  Scottywong’s admin hopeful list] for 4 March 2013, I have a score of 320. This is after 500 points were deducted on account of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User%3AKauffner MSGJ’s block] of July 2012. If you add these points to my score, I am ranked No. 12 on the list. (In ictu oculi is No. 184.) Up until this block, I had a clean record going back eight years that included tens of thousands of constructive edits.

:IIO and I used to translate foreign language titles to English together. This partnership lasted until June 2012, when [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GoodDay GoodDay was topic banned over diacritics]. The editors who had been involved in that case may have seen my case as a way to continue their pro-diacritics campaign. IIO has a surprising amount of time and energy to devote to following me around. He not only goes through my edit history to find people I have disagreed with in the past, but also sends warnings to anyone who might support my position. He is supported by Cuchullain, an admin with no interest in Vietnam or its diacritics. His complaint is that I had some sort of privileged status that I didn’t deserve. I was never even a rollbacker, I don’t know where this idea comes from.

:IIO and I used to translate foreign language titles to English together. This partnership lasted until June 2012, when [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GoodDay GoodDay was topic banned over diacritics]. The editors who had been involved in that case may have seen my case as a way to continue their pro-diacritics campaign. IIO has a surprising amount of time and energy to devote to following me around. He not only goes through my edit history to find people I have disagreed with in the past as well material to use against me, but he also sends warnings to anyone who might support my position. He is supported by Cuchullain, an admin with no interest in Vietnam or its diacritics. His complaint is that I had some sort of privileged status that I didn’t deserve. I was never even a rollbacker, I don’t know where this idea comes from.

:After IIO complained that I had moved the Vietnamese city of Can Tho to a non-diacritic title, MSGJ blocked me. As I had made over nine months earlier, I was unblocked almost immediately by Jenks24. Several unsuccessful proposals to topic ban me followed. After I was blocked for opposing the merger of my article on Sino-Vietnamese characters, there was a banning discussion in August 2013 where the old accusations were rehashed. But this time I was not allowed to defend myself, so it was passed.

:After IIO complained that I had moved the Vietnamese city of Can Tho to a non-diacritic title, MSGJ blocked me. As I had made over nine months earlier, I was unblocked almost immediately by Jenks24. Several unsuccessful proposals to topic ban me followed. After I was blocked for opposing the merger of my article on Sino-Vietnamese characters, there was a banning discussion in August 2013 where the old accusations were rehashed. But this time I was not allowed to defend myself, so it was passed.