Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,729
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 430:
Line 430: − − == Should I protect the article now? == − − Should I protect the article [[onservapedia:Editing article and talk pages]] now? Are you finished working on it? Or do you need more time? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 10:31, 6 January 2015 (EST)
Conservapedia talk:Editing article and talk pages (view source)
Revision as of 15:34, January 6, 2015
, 15:34, January 6, 2015→Should I protect the article now?
==Style books and references==
==Style books and references==
Shouldn't there be a discussion of style books and dictionaries here? I would expect a U.S.-based reference work to follow ''[http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/home.html The Chicago Manual of Style]'', including [http://www.merriam-webster.com Merriam-Webster] spelling. There is also AP style (for newspapers), MLA style (for scholarly papers), and [http://www.amazon.com/The-Yahoo-Style-Guide-Sourcebook/dp/031256984X Yahoo style]. The British use ''The Oxford Guide to Style.'' [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] 11:05, 17 January 2014 (EST)
Shouldn't there be a discussion of style books and dictionaries here? I would expect a U.S.-based reference work to follow ''[http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/home.html The Chicago Manual of Style]'', including [http://www.merriam-webster.com Merriam-Webster] spelling. There is also AP style (for newspapers), MLA style (for scholarly papers), and [http://www.amazon.com/The-Yahoo-Style-Guide-Sourcebook/dp/031256984X Yahoo style]. The British use ''The Oxford Guide to Style.'' [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] 11:05, 17 January 2014 (EST)