52
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: + + +
Debate:Is it okay for Conservapedia to have biased articles? (view source)
Revision as of 16:46, April 17, 2007
, 16:46, April 17, 2007→NO
Neither Conservapedia nor Wikipedia has any right to twist the truth, to say that black is white. If abortion does '''not''' cause breast cancer, then we '''must not''' say so. But if it does, we certainly have a right to do so, and perhaps even a moral obligation. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 13:16, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
Neither Conservapedia nor Wikipedia has any right to twist the truth, to say that black is white. If abortion does '''not''' cause breast cancer, then we '''must not''' say so. But if it does, we certainly have a right to do so, and perhaps even a moral obligation. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 13:16, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
It is completely unacceptble for any source to twist facts horribly as is done here and then present them to impressionable school children as fact. This is one of the most morally unsound programs I have ever encountered and I intend to continue posting this opinion on debate topics in an attempt to expose how evil this site truly is.
Helios-Fear no God, fear only that which can be seen or heard, for no God will lay hands upon one who denies them. Here in lies the weakness of faith.
==Yes==
==Yes==