SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,592
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 295:
Line 295: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Conservapedia:Desk/Miscellany (view source)
Revision as of 23:00, January 8, 2015
, 23:00, January 8, 2015→Interpretation of copyright policy: new section
Furthermore, a scan of the first page or two of the "analytic chemistry" results shows the term "analytical chemistry" is used even in these results.
Furthermore, a scan of the first page or two of the "analytic chemistry" results shows the term "analytical chemistry" is used even in these results.
This topic is covered in articles or pages called "Analytical chemistry" in both Wikipedia, Citizendium, a Royal Society of Chemistry wiki called "Learning Chemistry" and a UCDavis ChemWiki site, all of which I'm a member. [[User:HPadleckas|HPadleckas]] 21:18, 18 February 2014 (EST)
This topic is covered in articles or pages called "Analytical chemistry" in both Wikipedia, Citizendium, a Royal Society of Chemistry wiki called "Learning Chemistry" and a UCDavis ChemWiki site, all of which I'm a member. [[User:HPadleckas|HPadleckas]] 21:18, 18 February 2014 (EST)
== Interpretation of copyright policy ==
Here is something for our legal experts and admins to ponder.
1) Conservapedia has a copyright license that applies to all contributions. It allows further copying without attributions of contributions made here.
2) TAR got the author of a different website for permission to quote up to 800 words on Conservapedia but not further (without addressing whether he would allow futher copying without attributions.) [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:TheAmericanRedoubt&diff=next&oldid=1127248 diff]
3) TAR then takes brief quotes from the other website (without quotation marks) and creates short stub articles footnoting his copying to a template that makes reference to the permission email. (e.g, [[G3]] and [[7.62x51mm NATO]]
The questions are:
1) Should CP articles consist of block quotes from another website?
2) Would quotation marks be required in this context?
3) Should we get the author of the other website to agree to the right of further copying without attribution?
Perhaps while an admin is looking this over, he can move [[G3]] to "Heckler and Koch G3 rifle" and [[7.62x51mm NATO]] to "7.62x51mm NATO rifle".
Many thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 18:00, 8 January 2015 (EST)