1,660
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: + +
Talk:Essay:Motivation for the Hypothesis of Intelligent Design (view source)
Revision as of 18:44, April 17, 2007
, 18:44, April 17, 2007no edit summary
It has been expressly stated that ''anyone'' (even liberals! even Hojimachong!) can contribute to CP in order to make it 'fair' and 'balanced'. -- <font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Wik</font><font color="#444444" face="Times New Roman">i</font><font color="#666666" face="Times New Roman">nterpreter</font>'''<sup>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter talk?]</sup>
It has been expressly stated that ''anyone'' (even liberals! even Hojimachong!) can contribute to CP in order to make it 'fair' and 'balanced'. -- <font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Wik</font><font color="#444444" face="Times New Roman">i</font><font color="#666666" face="Times New Roman">nterpreter</font>'''<sup>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter talk?]</sup>
Oh, my. If you read what I said earlier, this is not written as FACT, but as an ESSAY. It is inherently opinion, and I do not represent it as anything other than that. It was also written, as stated, as a deliberate parody/mirror of another article cited here, which contains all of the same flaws as my essay. So, this essay is ''meant'' to be flawed; in the exact same way as the root essay it is based on. It uses the rhetorical technique of parody to show the flaws in something else. It is not meant to be taken literally as pro or anti ID.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 14:44, 17 April 2007 (EDT)