Changes

::Conservative, I ''heartily'' agree with you re Berkeley! The end list of helps articles listed as offered by Conservapedia will clarify that for the reader, if they do their reading. However, a parenthetical inline comment, not a footnote, such as "(considered a source of poor Biblical scholarship by most researchers)", would be most welcome! Balance is one thing, but truthfulness and accuracy is always revealing. Feel free to make insertions as needed. Appreciate your cogent observation (and ''thank you'' for the Redirect.). <br/>(''As soon as I finish proofreading the rest of the Apocrypha/Deuterocanonical articles, I will start again on the 4 remaining articles you requested I improve/create.'') <br/>'''''Semper Fi!''''' --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] 02:55, 16 January 2015 (EST)

::Conservative, I ''heartily'' agree with you re Berkeley! The end list of helps articles listed as offered by Conservapedia will clarify that for the reader, if they do their reading. However, a parenthetical inline comment, not a footnote, such as "(considered a source of poor Biblical scholarship by most researchers)", would be most welcome! Balance is one thing, but truthfulness and accuracy is always revealing. Feel free to make insertions as needed. Appreciate your cogent observation (and ''thank you'' for the Redirect.). <br/>(''As soon as I finish proofreading the rest of the Apocrypha/Deuterocanonical articles, I will start again on the 4 remaining articles you requested I improve/create.'') <br/>'''''Semper Fi!''''' --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] 02:55, 16 January 2015 (EST)

:::I placed a ''caveat'' above the list of critical studies sources. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] 10:50, 16 January 2015 (EST)

:::I placed a ''caveat'' above the list of critical studies sources. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] 10:50, 16 January 2015 (EST)