Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 928:
Line 928: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
User talk:TheAmericanRedoubt (view source)
Revision as of 20:25, January 17, 2015
, 20:25, January 17, 2015→Obama says the newspaper exercised bad judgment and brought this upon themselves
*Obama has repeatedly claimed that ISIS, al Qaeda, et. al. are "not Islamic."[http://www.wnd.com/2014/09/obama-isis-is-not-islamic/] This is, of course, a very silly claim. I mean, who elected Obama caliph? But it's not same as blaming the magazine for the attack. The White House also condemned Charlie Hedbo for running pornographic cartoons of Mohammed in 2012. [http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/01/07/flashback-wh-condemned-judgement-of-deeply-offensive-charlie-hebdo/]
*Obama has repeatedly claimed that ISIS, al Qaeda, et. al. are "not Islamic."[http://www.wnd.com/2014/09/obama-isis-is-not-islamic/] This is, of course, a very silly claim. I mean, who elected Obama caliph? But it's not same as blaming the magazine for the attack. The White House also condemned Charlie Hedbo for running pornographic cartoons of Mohammed in 2012. [http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/01/07/flashback-wh-condemned-judgement-of-deeply-offensive-charlie-hebdo/]
The arrogant and highly atheistic/secular French and French muslim situation is a volatile mix. The French atheist/muslim situation will probably get worse before it better. There seems to be a feedback loop of discrimination/hatred/violence/non-assimilation going on.[http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2015/01/14/terror-in-france-implications-for-muslim-integration/]
The Ireland/Italian muslim situation seems a lot less volatile. I think the Irish/Italians (who tend to be more religious) are nicer and less arrogant then the atheistic/secularists French.[http://www.irishexaminer.com/viewpoints/columnists/victoria-white/it-is-frances-arrogant-secularism-that-is-the-truly-intolerant-religion-306959.html] And Ireland's Muslims are more highly educated.[http://www.irishexaminer.com/viewpoints/columnists/victoria-white/it-is-frances-arrogant-secularism-that-is-the-truly-intolerant-religion-306959.html]
In addition, judging from his radio mini-debates with theists, the Irish atheist [[Michael Nugent]] seems nicer and less abrasive than many prominent atheists/agnostics (see: [[Atheism and arrogance]]). Research shows that atheists are more charitable when they are around Christians/Christian culture.[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imuaiRO5mSQ&feature=sub] Maybe atheists become nicer when they are around theists/Christians as well. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 07:29, 17 January 2015 (EST)
The secular/godless and evolution loving countries of Germany/France/UK who have sub-fertility rates are projected to be overrun by Muslims by 2030.[http://time.com/3670892/muslims-europe-map/]
I do know that a German Christian denomination that adheres to creationism is growing.
I think this is due to businesses having labor shortages and needing workers and the respective countries immigration policies and the countries wanting to support pensioners, but I could be mistaken.
In Switzerland, which is one of the most biblical creation loving countries of Europe and has more restrictive immigration policies, the proliferation of problem causing Muslims by 2030 is not projected to be an issue. Ireland does not appear to be projected to have a problem either (Perhaps it is because they are more religious than most Europe. The fertility rate of Ireland is 2.01 births per woman).
Of course, the projections of Muslims overrunning Germany/UK/France has the militant evolutionists/atheists/agnostics/secularists upset. For example, Richard Dawkins frequently mentions Muslims on his Twitter feed. If only these countries were more Christianity/creationism loving and had more children. All this unpleasantness with radical Muslims causing significant problems in their countries could be avoided.
On December 23, 2012, Professor [[Eric Kaufmann]] who teaches at Birbeck College, University of London wrote:
“I argue that 97% of the world's population growth is taking place in the developing world, where 95% of people are religious.
On the other hand, the secular West and East Asia has very low fertility and a rapidly aging population. The demographic disparity between the religious, growing global South and the aging, secular global North will peak around 2050. In the coming decades, the developed world's demand for workers to pay its pensions and work in its service sector will soar alongside the booming supply of young people in the third world. Ergo, we can expect significant immigration to the secular West which will import religious revival on the back of ethnic change. In addition, those with religious beliefs tend to have higher birth rates than the secular population, with fundamentalists having far larger families. The epicentre of these trends will be in immigration gateway cities like New York (a third white), Amsterdam (half Dutch), Los Angeles (28% white), and London, 45% white British."[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/04/97-of-worlds-population-growth-is.html]
Of course, this all bad news for evolutionists/atheists/agnostics. I am hoping that theological conservative and biblical Christianity ultimately prevails in Europe in the 21st century. A lot is dependent on evangelism and policies regarding immigration. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 14:13, 17 January 2015 (EST)
:In addition, in Switzerland, they have generous gun laws and a gun culture (and low gun fatality rates), so citizens are better able to protect themselves against radical muslims. They are not so dependent on police/SWAT response times. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 14:25, 17 January 2015 (EST)