Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
177 bytes added ,  20:15, January 20, 2015
no edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:  
Wiretaps authorized on persons rather than the communications hardware are very useful for [[law enforcement]] when a suspect has easy access to various [[cell phone]]s, [[computer]]s, [[pay phone]]s, and private land lines. Before roving wiretaps, the [[Federal Bureau of Investigation|FBI]] would need to get a separate FISC ([[Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court]]) warrant for each method of communication used by a terrorist. With roving wiretaps, the FBI only needs to get one warrant, and tap whatever line the suspect happens to be using at the time.<ref name="206derosa">DeRosa, Mary. “Section 206: Roving Surveillance Authority Under FISA: A Summary” (American Bar Association, 2005). </ref>
 
Wiretaps authorized on persons rather than the communications hardware are very useful for [[law enforcement]] when a suspect has easy access to various [[cell phone]]s, [[computer]]s, [[pay phone]]s, and private land lines. Before roving wiretaps, the [[Federal Bureau of Investigation|FBI]] would need to get a separate FISC ([[Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court]]) warrant for each method of communication used by a terrorist. With roving wiretaps, the FBI only needs to get one warrant, and tap whatever line the suspect happens to be using at the time.<ref name="206derosa">DeRosa, Mary. “Section 206: Roving Surveillance Authority Under FISA: A Summary” (American Bar Association, 2005). </ref>
   −
The FISA Act which created the FISA Court itself has become outmoded, the original intent directed against foreign [[nation state]]s, and did not adaquately consider the national security threat coming from non-state actors, such as terrorist organizations.  Hence terrorists were able to exploit a loophole in the law.
+
The FISA Act which created the FISA Court itself has become outmoded, the original intent directed against foreign [[nation state]]s, and did not adequately consider the national security threat coming from non-state actors, such as terrorist organizations.  Hence terrorists were able to exploit a loophole in the law.
    
The [[Patriot Act]] extended the use of roving wiretaps to include the investigation of [[terrorist]] activities.
 
The [[Patriot Act]] extended the use of roving wiretaps to include the investigation of [[terrorist]] activities.
 +
 +
==See Also==
 +
* [[Surveillance]]
    
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references />
 
<references />
   −
[[category:law]]
+
[[Category : Law]]
 +
[[Category : Espionage]]
 +
[[Category : Privacy]]
 +
[[Category : Fourth Amendment]]
 +
[[Category : Communication]]
 +
[[Category : Computer Security]]
SkipCaptcha
12,693

edits

Navigation menu