80
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 994:
Line 994: + + + + + + + +
User talk:TheAmericanRedoubt (view source)
Revision as of 17:59, January 23, 2015
, 17:59, January 23, 2015→Blocked: new section
:[[User_talk:Wschact#Wschact_Banned_Again_.2814_Days.29_for_Continued_Biased_Targeting_of_Conservative_POV_Survivalism_Articles]]
:[[User_talk:Wschact#Wschact_Banned_Again_.2814_Days.29_for_Continued_Biased_Targeting_of_Conservative_POV_Survivalism_Articles]]
:[[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 16:24, 20 January 2015 (EST)
:[[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 16:24, 20 January 2015 (EST)
== Blocked ==
So, given the understanding that my block has now expired, I'd like to discuss it with you. The short version is, I did give reason for removing the extra, and ample one at that. In [[Talk:Seung-Hui Cho#Re-Added Category:Gun Free Zones Removed by User:IHop]] I explained that Seung-Hui Cho performed his massacre ''in'' a gun free zone, not ''because of'' a gun free zone, and that he, himself is ''not'' a gun free zone. [[Virginia Tech shootings]] would be an accurate place for the Category:Gun free zones tag, but not the shooter himself.
In response to my second removal, wherein I justified my position, you blocked me for "Removing justified Category tags 2x without documenting why - trolling - sockpuppet for liberal troll?" While I admit that I should have put something in the talk page '''before''' the removal, we live and learn, and I did justify my position. I was not "trolling," nor am I a "sockpuppet for [a] liberal troll"
Please understand, I'm not trying to be argumentative here, I'm trying to understand exactly what I did wrong, and presenting the situation as I see it. Please, correct my inaccuracies in this situation.