Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,910
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 74:
Line 74: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→Bestiality and godless Britain
''See:'' [[Bestiality and Britain]] and [[Atheism and bestiality]]
''See:'' [[Bestiality and Britain]] and [[Atheism and bestiality]]
[[Bestiality]] is the act of engaging in sexual relations with an animal.
=== Sexual mutilations and stabbings of horses in Britain ===
Between 1983 and 1993 more than 160 horses were sexually mutilated and stabbed in [[Britain]].<ref>[http://www.horsetalk.co.nz/features/slashers.shtml Horse slashers profiled]</ref> British police and animal experts have put the blame on fertility cults, rival horse owners and [[sadism|sadists]] for the attacks.<ref>[http://www.horsetalk.co.nz/features/slashers.shtml Horse slashers profiled]</ref>
=== Bestiality and small British animals ===
The abstract of the 2008 ''Journal of Small Animal Practice'' article entitled ''Battered pets’: sexual abuse'' indicated: "A study of non-accidental injury in small animals in the UK, based on responses from a random sample of small animal practitioners, identified 6 per cent of the 448 reported cases as being sexual in nature".<ref>[Battered pets’: sexual abuse. ''Journal of Small Animal Practice - 2008 article '']</ref>
== British atheist and evolutionist Christopher Hitchens on bestiality ==
[[Image:Hitchens,_Stanford.jpg |right|thumb|200px|[[Britain|British]] atheist [[Christopher Hitchens]] twice refused to condemn bestiality at the [[William Lane Craig]] vs. Christopher Hitchens debate.<ref>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FofDChlSILU Christopher Hitchens vs William Lane Craig - Does God Exist Debate]</ref> See also: [[Atheism and bestiality]] ]]
''
See also:'' [[Christopher Hitchens on bestiality]] and [[Atheism and bestiality]] and [[Evolutionary belief and bestiality]]
[[Christopher Hitchens]] is one of the principal leaders of the [[New Atheism]] movement. At the end of the [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] [[William Lane Craig]] vs. atheist Christopher Hitchens debate there was an audience question and answer period.[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FofDChlSILU VIDEO] The first audience member to ask a question twice asked [[Christopher Hitchens]] to label bestiality as an immoral act, but he refused to do so.<ref>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FofDChlSILU Christopher Hitchens vs William Lane Craig - Does God Exist Debate]</ref> Dr. Craig said the question posed to Hitchens was a good one and it helped illustrate that atheism cannot offer objective moral standards (see: [[Atheism and morality]]).<ref>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FofDChlSILU Christopher Hitchens vs William Lane Craig - Does God Exist Debate] </ref>
=== UK TV regulators and bestiality ===
''See also:'' [[Britain and morality]]
On May 26, 2005, [[LifeSiteNews]] reported:
{{cquote|Richard Hooper, deputy chairman of Ofcom (the UK’s TV and radio regulating body), has indicated that the long-anticipated new broadcasting code makes no definite provisions against the broadcasting of so-called ‘challenging material’ on public air-waves, including shows which deal with sex with animals, so long as it is in the proper ‘context’.
“A programme about sex with animals? Yes, it’s potentially possible,” said Ofcom deputy chairman, Richard Hooper. “It all comes down to context.” Mr. Hooper may have been thinking of a channel 4 documentary on bestiality, Animal Passions, which was aired last year. According to a Media Guardian article that particular documentary received seventy-five complaints at the time, from viewers who were concerned that it “normalized bestiality”.
Mr. Hooper’s statement serves to confirm what pro-family activists have long prophesied. That is, this new age of sexual libertarianism, which, amongst other things, allows for and normalizes homosexuality, will quickly become an age of ‘no-holds-barred’ in regards to sexual deviation unless a return to a proper understanding of sexuality is initiated.<ref>[http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/uk-tv-regulators-ok-bestiality UK TV Regulators OK Bestiality - LifeSiteNews - May 26, 2005]</ref>}}
=== The Guardian and bestiality ===
On September 19, 2011, the British newspaper ''The [[Guardian]]'' published a favorable article on bestiality entitled ''Improbable research: bestiality saddled with the wrong image'' which mentioned a man's "long courtship" with a horse and also his two "mare-wives".<ref>[http://www.theguardian.com/education/2011/sep/19/improbable-research-bestiality-horses-intelligence ''Improbable research: bestiality saddled with the wrong image'']</ref>
=== British woman marries her dog and kissed the dog during the marriage ceremony ===
In 2014, the British woman Amanda Rogers married her dog and she kissed her dog during the marriage ceremony.<ref>[http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/woman-marries-dog-totally-b-h-article-1.1717772 British woman marries her dog]</ref>
The ''NY Daily News'' reported:
{{cquote|Rodgers, whose Twitter feed uses the name "shebarodgers," told the Metro she got down on one knee to propose and ascertained from Sheba's wagging tail that she said yes.
She said the ceremony, which ended with a kiss, was the perfect way to mark what Sheba means to her. She told the Metro her new life partner was never unkind to her and the dog is always happy.<ref>[http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/woman-marries-dog-totally-b-h-article-1.1717772 British woman marries her dog]</ref>}}
=== Publicly displayed bestiality artwork expected to fetch a price of around £30,000 in Britain ===
''See also:'' [[Britain and morality]] and [[Liberalism and bestiality]]
[[File:Keldaby goats.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|An exclusive British art gallery was criticised for displaying a highly offensive bestiality oriented painting which featured a [[goat]] just yards from The Ritz hotel and where it could be seen by children.<ref>The Daily Mail online (MailOnline), August 5, 2011 ''The explicit art that shows bestiality with a [[goat]] just yards from The Ritz''</ref>]]
In August of 2011 the British newspaper the Daily Mail ran a story entitled ''The explicit art that shows bestiality with a [[goat]] just yards from The Ritz'' which declared:
{{cquote|An exclusive art gallery has been criticised for displaying a highly offensive painting just yards from The Ritz hotel and where it could be seen by children.
Hotel guests were said to have been disgusted after seeing the image by the late British artist Robert Lenkiewicz – which depicts bestiality with a goat.
It was displayed on a revolving plinth in the front window of the Clarendon Fine Art gallery, around the corner from the five-star hotel in Piccadilly.
The picture – which is owned by a private collector and is expected to sell for around £30,000 – was still on display yesterday, although last night the gallery said it had been removed.
<ref>The Daily Mail online (MailOnline), August 5, 2011 ''The explicit art that shows bestiality with a goat just yards from The Ritz''</ref>}}
== See also ==
== See also ==