Critics of Wikipedia state that Wikipedia's articles contain [[systemic bias]], and that the information included within its articles are a mixture of truths, half-truths, and falsehoods. <ref name=hnn>http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/125437</ref> The nature of Wikipedia also makes it subject to spin and [[bias]], examples of which include paid [[public relations]] advocacy and inserting libellious content into the biographies of politicians for a political purpose. <ref name=hnn/> | Critics of Wikipedia state that Wikipedia's articles contain [[systemic bias]], and that the information included within its articles are a mixture of truths, half-truths, and falsehoods. <ref name=hnn>http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/125437</ref> The nature of Wikipedia also makes it subject to spin and [[bias]], examples of which include paid [[public relations]] advocacy and inserting libellious content into the biographies of politicians for a political purpose. <ref name=hnn/> |