Critics of Wikipedia state that Wikipedia's articles contain [[bias|systemic bias]]<ref name=howtheleft>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-swindle/how-the-left-conquered-wikipedia-part-1/</ref>, and that the information included within its articles are a mixture of truths, half-truths, and falsehoods. <ref name=hnn>http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/125437</ref> The nature of Wikipedia also makes it subject to spin and [[bias]], examples of which include paid public relations advocacy and inserting libellious content into the biographies of politicians for a political purpose. <ref name=hnn/> Wikipedia was also criticized for having a [[liberal bias]] in its articles about politics, despite of Wikipedia's "neutral point of view" policy. <ref name=howtheleft/> | Critics of Wikipedia state that Wikipedia's articles contain [[bias|systemic bias]]<ref name=howtheleft>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-swindle/how-the-left-conquered-wikipedia-part-1/</ref>, and that the information included within its articles are a mixture of truths, half-truths, and falsehoods. <ref name=hnn>http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/125437</ref> The nature of Wikipedia also makes it subject to spin and [[bias]], examples of which include paid public relations advocacy and inserting libellious content into the biographies of politicians for a political purpose. <ref name=hnn/> Wikipedia was also criticized for having a [[liberal bias]] in its articles about politics, despite of Wikipedia's "neutral point of view" policy. <ref name=howtheleft/> |