Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 119:
Line 119: − [[File:http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffc04.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Ff%2F2010%2F154%2F8%2F1%2FRaptor_Jesus_by_DangermouseDavs.jpg&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thethinkingatheist.com%2Fforum%2FThread-If-you-believe-in-sandwiches-why-not-raptor-jesus&docid=7ingYA_x97z3BM&tbnid=J4T674oLHQpLaM%3A&w=680&h=879&ei=mjzYVLvBEIXLaN3JgsAH&ved=0CAIQxiAwAA&iact=c]]+
Reverted edits by Rsmith (talk) to last revision by Aschlafly
==== Extinction ====
==== Extinction ====
Creation science rejects the great impact theory, and find a number of faults in that theory.<ref>Jonathan Sarfati, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2426 Did a meteor wipe out the dinosaurs?].</ref> Despite these critiques, the great impact theory is widely considered by the scientific community to be fact. However, those scientists cannot prove the great impact theory definitively.
Creation science rejects the great impact theory, and find a number of faults in that theory.<ref>Jonathan Sarfati, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2426 Did a meteor wipe out the dinosaurs?].</ref> Despite these critiques, the great impact theory is widely considered by the scientific community to be fact. However, those scientists cannot prove the great impact theory definitively.