101
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 64:
Line 64: + + + + + + +
→Unusual wording in the intro: new section
That's in the past now. That trial already occurred. Someone should update it. [[User:Ctown200|Ctown200]] 08:20, 9 May 2010 (EDT)
That's in the past now. That trial already occurred. Someone should update it. [[User:Ctown200|Ctown200]] 08:20, 9 May 2010 (EDT)
== Unusual wording in the intro ==
This sentence has an odd structure:
''Her nomination was fully supported by the Democrat leadership, whose consistent theme they espouse Sotomayor as "a truly American story." ''
The clause "whose consistent theme they espouse Sotomayor as" doesn't make sense. I think her name should be removed in order to make it a proper sentence. Also, I'm curious as to why this page is locked. Is there a lot of vandalism on a relatively mundane article? [[User:ScottH35|ScottH35]] 17:02, 9 February 2015 (EST)