Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
8 bytes removed ,  07:35, February 14, 2015
no edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:  
* Ban all [[internet]]-based sales of ammunition by online retailers such as [[Cheaper Than Dirt]]. Interestingly, the Democrats re-added this provision to the 2014 ammunition control bill even though it was declared [[unconstitutional]] by the California [[Supreme Court]]. This would have cost the taxpayers and the [[NRA]], [[Gun Owners of America]] and the [[Second Amendment Foundation]] a lot of money re-defending this issue in the court system.
 
* Ban all [[internet]]-based sales of ammunition by online retailers such as [[Cheaper Than Dirt]]. Interestingly, the Democrats re-added this provision to the 2014 ammunition control bill even though it was declared [[unconstitutional]] by the California [[Supreme Court]]. This would have cost the taxpayers and the [[NRA]], [[Gun Owners of America]] and the [[Second Amendment Foundation]] a lot of money re-defending this issue in the court system.
   −
If ammunition control had passed in California, as it did in the gun-grabbing, high crime, liberal bastion of [[Chicago]], California would have been the first state to pass such draconian law. It wouldn't have been long before the other most of the current 16 [[unfree states]] (such as [[Massachusetts]], [[New York]], [[New Jersey]], [[Illinois]], [[Maryland]] and [[Colorado]]) tend to follow the trend-setting California when it comes to liberal [[Nany state]] legislation.
+
If ammunition control had passed in California, as it did in the gun-grabbing, high crime, liberal bastion of [[Chicago]], California would have been the first state to pass such draconian law. It wouldn't have been long before the other most of the current 16 unfree states (such as [[Massachusetts]], [[New York]], [[New Jersey]], [[Illinois]], [[Maryland]] and [[Colorado]]) tend to follow the trend-setting California when it comes to liberal [[Nany state]] legislation.
    
Despite passing almost unanimously in the [[left-wing]] [[Democrat]] controlled California State [[Legislature]], it was surprisingly vetoed by [[elitist]] [[liberal]] gun collector [[Governor]] [[Jerry Brown]] in 2014. Governor Brown has a long history of voting for, supporting, and as governor in the 1970s and 21st century, signing gun control legislation despite himself being a gun collector. Governor Brown said on his veto that ammunition control would do little to stop crime.  
 
Despite passing almost unanimously in the [[left-wing]] [[Democrat]] controlled California State [[Legislature]], it was surprisingly vetoed by [[elitist]] [[liberal]] gun collector [[Governor]] [[Jerry Brown]] in 2014. Governor Brown has a long history of voting for, supporting, and as governor in the 1970s and 21st century, signing gun control legislation despite himself being a gun collector. Governor Brown said on his veto that ammunition control would do little to stop crime.  
Line 36: Line 36:     
==Unfree States Attempting Ammunition Control==
 
==Unfree States Attempting Ammunition Control==
−
In 2008 there were 18 [[unfree states]] seeking to impose some form of '''ammunition control''' over lawful owners and users of guns:<ref>http://ammunitionaccountability.org/Legislation.htm</ref>
+
In 2008 there were 18 unfree states seeking to impose some form of '''ammunition control''' over lawful owners and users of guns:<ref>http://ammunitionaccountability.org/Legislation.htm</ref>
    
*[[Alabama]]
 
*[[Alabama]]
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,132

edits

Navigation menu