| | [[Constitutional carry]] (as both [[concealed carry]] and [[open carry]] as is common in [[Israel]]) is the [[conservative]] alternative to the "Free fire zones" supported by the [[progressive]] [[police state]]'s [[:Essay:Anti-self-defense movement|Anti-self-defense movement]]. Constitutional carry can also be a useful [[antiterrorism]] tool in the [[American]] [[War on Terror]]. An example of an antiterrorist policy is [[Israel]] permitting its citizens to [[open carry|carry weapons]]. This has helped to cut down on terrorist attacks there.<ref>[http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2002/02/22/mideast_020222.html Israel shopper users her gun to stop a [[suicide bomber]]]. Accessed January 12, 2015</ref> | | [[Constitutional carry]] (as both [[concealed carry]] and [[open carry]] as is common in [[Israel]]) is the [[conservative]] alternative to the "Free fire zones" supported by the [[progressive]] [[police state]]'s [[:Essay:Anti-self-defense movement|Anti-self-defense movement]]. Constitutional carry can also be a useful [[antiterrorism]] tool in the [[American]] [[War on Terror]]. An example of an antiterrorist policy is [[Israel]] permitting its citizens to [[open carry|carry weapons]]. This has helped to cut down on terrorist attacks there.<ref>[http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2002/02/22/mideast_020222.html Israel shopper users her gun to stop a [[suicide bomber]]]. Accessed January 12, 2015</ref> |
| − | Renowned [[Oath Keepers|Oath Keeper]] [[gun enthusiast]] [[Air Force]] Lt. [[Colonel]] [[Nutnfancy]]<ref> [https://www.youtube.com/user/nutnfancy/about YouTube Channel] has 174,010,430 views and 505,609 subscribers since he established it on Jul 9, 2006</ref>, says "Gun free zones are a LIE. There is no such thing and [[criminal|wolves]] can always get a [[firearm]] into these areas. Given an evildoer with a willingness to die, these areas then become '[[Essay:France Pays Dearly - Liberal Gun Control Laws and Gun Free Zones that Welcome Terrorists|free fire zones]]' where [[shooting|shooters]] have engaged with initial impunity. In these areas, few law abiding citizens possess the most efficient means to stop the killing: the [[gun]]. There are many case studies which prove the abhorrent failure of this [[polyanna|feel-good]] but dangerous policy. It is a misguided and [[corruption|corrupt]] political system that seeks to [[gun control|disarm]] the [[Oath Keepers|good guys]] in some dragnet-type, pseudo-[[:Category:Safety|public safety]] policy that happily disarms ALL [[citizen]]s in the slight hope that the [[terrorist|lawless]] will also comply. They won't and haven't and never will. The 'gun-less' approach has failed miserably in the face of disturbed but motivated [[young mass murderers|mass killer]]s. It continues to cost lives." | + | Renowned [[Oath Keepers|Oath Keeper]] [[gun enthusiast]] [[Air Force]] Lt. [[Colonel]] [[Nutnfancy]]<ref> [https://www.youtube.com/user/nutnfancy/about YouTube Channel] has 174,010,430 views and 505,609 subscribers since he established it on Jul 9, 2006</ref>, says "Gun free zones are a LIE. There is no such thing and [[criminal|wolves]] can always get a [[firearm]] into these areas. Given an evildoer with a willingness to die, these areas then become '[[Essay:France Pays Dearly - Liberal Gun Control Laws and Gun Free Zones that Welcome Terrorists|free fire zones]]' where [[shooting|shooters]] have engaged with initial impunity. In these areas, few law abiding citizens possess the most efficient means to stop the killing: the [[gun]]. There are many case studies which prove the abhorrent failure of this feel-good but dangerous policy. It is a misguided and [[corruption|corrupt]] political system that seeks to [[gun control|disarm]] the [[Oath Keepers|good guys]] in some dragnet-type, pseudo-[[:Category:Safety|public safety]] policy that happily disarms ALL [[citizen]]s in the slight hope that the [[terrorist|lawless]] will also comply. They won't and haven't and never will. The 'gun-less' approach has failed miserably in the face of disturbed but motivated [[young mass murderers|mass killer]]s. It continues to cost lives." |
| | Nutnfancy asserts that "No technology, no system, no law will or can prevent such a determined individual in taking lives. If it isn't the gun, he will find [[knives|other means]] to accomplish his [[violence|brutal]] agenda. The REAL solution is [[political correctness|politically incorrect]] but proven to work: [[firearms|lethal force]] ([[concealed carry]] and/or [[open carry]]) employed immediately by a [[Essay:Sheepdogs for the sheeple|sheepdog]], either [[civilian]], [[Oath Keepers|veteran]] or [[law enforcement]] (also reference [[Nutnfancy]] video 'The [[Essay:Concealed Carry Protocol|Concealed Carry Protocol]]" [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ei8OK4WdoW0 Youtube]). [[Police]] have an unreliable track record in being able to quickly stop the [[young mass murderer|mass murderer]]; they can never arrive in time to prevent [[death]]. Better it is to have responsible citizens [[Everyday carry|armed]] and at the ready and vigilant. The gun will stop the gun and has many times. As in my video 'Close to Engage' ([http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oH3GV7EmzI4 YouTube]) shows, other methodologies exist but all require increased risk and closer contact. Instead we should abolish Gun Free Zones and encourage responsible, mature [[concealed carry|CCW]] holders to prevail in the next [[Charlie Hebdo|mass killing]] by allowing them to have the most effective means of [[self-defense|resistance]]. For some individuals, it may be necessary to engage in 'conscientious objection' against these [[gun control|disarmament]] restrictions. A [[preparedness|prepared]] 'Sheepdog' who is [[courage|courageous]], with sound judgment, has been proven to be the real life saver in past mass shootings." | | Nutnfancy asserts that "No technology, no system, no law will or can prevent such a determined individual in taking lives. If it isn't the gun, he will find [[knives|other means]] to accomplish his [[violence|brutal]] agenda. The REAL solution is [[political correctness|politically incorrect]] but proven to work: [[firearms|lethal force]] ([[concealed carry]] and/or [[open carry]]) employed immediately by a [[Essay:Sheepdogs for the sheeple|sheepdog]], either [[civilian]], [[Oath Keepers|veteran]] or [[law enforcement]] (also reference [[Nutnfancy]] video 'The [[Essay:Concealed Carry Protocol|Concealed Carry Protocol]]" [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ei8OK4WdoW0 Youtube]). [[Police]] have an unreliable track record in being able to quickly stop the [[young mass murderer|mass murderer]]; they can never arrive in time to prevent [[death]]. Better it is to have responsible citizens [[Everyday carry|armed]] and at the ready and vigilant. The gun will stop the gun and has many times. As in my video 'Close to Engage' ([http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oH3GV7EmzI4 YouTube]) shows, other methodologies exist but all require increased risk and closer contact. Instead we should abolish Gun Free Zones and encourage responsible, mature [[concealed carry|CCW]] holders to prevail in the next [[Charlie Hebdo|mass killing]] by allowing them to have the most effective means of [[self-defense|resistance]]. For some individuals, it may be necessary to engage in 'conscientious objection' against these [[gun control|disarmament]] restrictions. A [[preparedness|prepared]] 'Sheepdog' who is [[courage|courageous]], with sound judgment, has been proven to be the real life saver in past mass shootings." |