4
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: + + + +
Talk:National Health Service (view source)
Revision as of 22:26, February 15, 2015
, 22:26, February 15, 2015no edit summary
Is this serious!? How can you possibly compare the NHS, an institution that actually saves lives (and yes, I know it is not perfect, but what system is?), and the Chinese military!? It is ridiculous. Though I am proud that the NHS is so large. I have only positive experiences of the NHS and I hope it exists far into the future[[User:Liberalnproud|Liberalnproud]]
Is this serious!? How can you possibly compare the NHS, an institution that actually saves lives (and yes, I know it is not perfect, but what system is?), and the Chinese military!? It is ridiculous. Though I am proud that the NHS is so large. I have only positive experiences of the NHS and I hope it exists far into the future[[User:Liberalnproud|Liberalnproud]]
:They were comparing the number of employees. What's rediculous about that? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 21:37, 14 November 2008 (EST)
:They were comparing the number of employees. What's rediculous about that? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 21:37, 14 November 2008 (EST)
This is one of the most retarded articles I have ever read. I mean, I know it's going to have a conservative slant, but seriously?
The NHS is continuous rated on of the top health systems in the world...