Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
685 bytes added ,  03:22, April 18, 2007
Line 34: Line 34:  
::::Your comment about discrediting evidence on the basis that there was a flood misses TerryH's point.  First, a date is not "evidence" itself (you don't dig up dates), it is a calculation based on evidence and assumptions.  Second, TerryH was talking about such date that are calculated ''presuming'' that there was no flood.  To use dates based on the ''presumption'' that there was no flood to show that there was no flood is a circular argument, and it is quite proper to exclude them.
 
::::Your comment about discrediting evidence on the basis that there was a flood misses TerryH's point.  First, a date is not "evidence" itself (you don't dig up dates), it is a calculation based on evidence and assumptions.  Second, TerryH was talking about such date that are calculated ''presuming'' that there was no flood.  To use dates based on the ''presumption'' that there was no flood to show that there was no flood is a circular argument, and it is quite proper to exclude them.
 
::::[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:18, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
 
::::[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:18, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
−
 
+
You seem to argue here that assuming part of your argument takes analysis outside the realm of science - at least that's what TerryH argues, when he says that "assuming there was no flood" makes it not good science.  Conceding this point ''arguendo'', I'd like to cross apply your reasoning, and broaden its scope: assuming part of an argument does invalidate the argument, I will phrase it.  Applying this to creation science, which Philip concedes assumes a creator, it is clear that [[creation science]] is also bad science.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 23:22, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
 
==Subterranean Salt Deposits==
 
==Subterranean Salt Deposits==
    
There is a band of sea-deposited salt that underlies  many sedimentary rocks stretching from West of Ireland into Russia. Would any 'flood-geologist' please explain this.{{unsigned|LateralQuercus}}
 
There is a band of sea-deposited salt that underlies  many sedimentary rocks stretching from West of Ireland into Russia. Would any 'flood-geologist' please explain this.{{unsigned|LateralQuercus}}
2,732

edits

Navigation menu