Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 62: Line 62:  
Evil can't be real if morals are relative. Evil is real, though. That's why people object to it...
 
Evil can't be real if morals are relative. Evil is real, though. That's why people object to it...
   −
The argument against God based on the problem of evil can only be raised if some form of moral objectivism is true. Morals, therefore, exist. I need not give a complete taxonomy of ethical guidelines to make my case. If there is even one moral absolute, it invites the question, "What kind of world view explains the existence of this moral rule?"
+
The argument against God based on the problem of evil can only be raised if some form of moral objectivism is true. Morals, therefore, exist. I need not give a complete [[taxonomy]] of ethical guidelines to make my case. If there is even one moral absolute, it invites the question, "What kind of world view explains the existence of this moral rule?"
    
Atheism can't make any sense of it.<ref>[http://www.str.org/articles/evil-as-evidence-for-god#.VOyKDrbhi1s Evil as Evidence for God ]</ref>}}
 
Atheism can't make any sense of it.<ref>[http://www.str.org/articles/evil-as-evidence-for-god#.VOyKDrbhi1s Evil as Evidence for God ]</ref>}}
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,387

edits

Navigation menu