Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + +
User talk:Cptstubing (view source)
Revision as of 12:17, February 26, 2015
, 12:17, February 26, 2015@User:Karajou
And your sources to prove we have a bias? Plus, your sources that proves the liberal side of the fence is all lollipops and cuddly animals. I would love to see them. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 05:48, 26 February 2015 (EST)
And your sources to prove we have a bias? Plus, your sources that proves the liberal side of the fence is all lollipops and cuddly animals. I would love to see them. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 05:48, 26 February 2015 (EST)
:It seems to be absurd to claim that Conservapedia has no bias! Karajou, you yourself wrote about the [[Conservapedia Bible Project]]:
::"''It's already proven in all walks of life that liberals are either liars or lunatics, so any percentage of liberalism in the project just isn't going to happen. Karajou 14:19, 14 October 2009 (EDT) ''"
:So, if there is a conservative claim and a liberal claim, Conservapedia will side with the conservative position, as the liberal position is compromised per se. That's pretty much a textbook example of [[bias]]. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 07:17, 26 February 2015 (EST)