Changes

Second, please explain why the footnoting style and content/writing style is different in the [[homosexuality]]/[[Atheist actions against homosexuals]] (formerly called Atheist persecution of homosexuals) article. The User: Conservative account editor base is made up of more than one editor! Given your angry and crass post above which contained vulgarity (see: [[Atheism and profanity]]), your adamant insistence that the User: Conservative account is made up of one editor is not troubling to me (nor is it troubling to us!).  

Second, please explain why the footnoting style and content/writing style is different in the [[homosexuality]]/[[Atheist actions against homosexuals]] (formerly called Atheist persecution of homosexuals) article. The User: Conservative account editor base is made up of more than one editor! Given your angry and crass post above which contained vulgarity (see: [[Atheism and profanity]]), your adamant insistence that the User: Conservative account is made up of one editor is not troubling to me (nor is it troubling to us!).  

Third,  I don't support feminism and I don't the men's rights movement/"Manosphere" (which Beale tends to fall on in terms of gender relations).  I am a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complementarianism complementarian].  I realize that the left commonly engages in groupthink, strict ideological purity tests and aggressive punitive actions against political dissenters, but I think not citing authors due to not agreeing with all of their views or summarily discounting everything they say is committing the [[genetic fallacy]] and is a cheap method of disqualifying opponents rather than addressing legitimate arguments that they may make. Beale wrote the excellent book ''The Irrational Atheist'' and his book is even cited at Wikipedia in their criticism of atheism article (a wiki founded by an atheist and an agnostic).[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_atheism] .  Furthermore, a fairly positive review of his book ''The Irrational Atheist'' was done by a woman.[http://creation.com/review-irrational-atheist-by-vox-day]  The book is also a good seller and the publisher will not make a deal with Beale to buy its publisher rights.  

Third,  I don't support feminism and I don't the men's rights movement/"Manosphere" (which Beale tends to fall on in terms of gender relations).  I am a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complementarianism complementarian].  I realize that the left commonly engages in groupthink, strict ideological purity tests and aggressive punitive actions against political dissenters, but I think not citing authors due to not agreeing with all of their views or summarily discounting everything they say is committing the [[genetic fallacy]] and is a cheap method of disqualifying opponents rather than addressing legitimate arguments that they may make. Beale wrote the excellent book ''The Irrational Atheist'' and his book is even cited at Wikipedia in their criticism of atheism article (Wikipedia is a wiki founded by an atheist and an agnostic).[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_atheism] .  Furthermore, a fairly positive review of his book ''The Irrational Atheist'' was done by a woman.[http://creation.com/review-irrational-atheist-by-vox-day]  The book is also a good seller and the publisher will not make a deal with Beale to buy its publisher rights.  

As far as me helping the atheist/agnostic woman and your insistence that it never happened, as Ripley said, "Believe it or not!". I will sleep very well tonight knowing that a crass and angry atheist angrily denies an event happened when I know for certain that it did! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:02, 4 March 2015 (EST)

As far as me helping the atheist/agnostic woman and your insistence that it never happened, as Ripley said, "Believe it or not!". I will sleep very well tonight knowing that a crass and angry atheist angrily denies an event happened when I know for certain that it did! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:02, 4 March 2015 (EST)