SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 668:
Line 668: − + Line 692:
Line 692: − + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→re: The person most hated at RW :-)
You wrote: "the person most hated at RW :-)"
You wrote: "the person most hated at RW :-)"
:::I apologize for that. I generally try not to let emotions interfere with my judgment, and I'm not always successful at that. I was angry over the fact that this guy had gotten blocked (not by you) for a bogus reason.
:::I apologize for that. I generally try not to let emotions interfere with my judgment, but I'm not always successful at that. I was angry over the fact that this guy had gotten blocked (not by you) for a bogus reason.
:::I've done a little looking around at what's been going on at RW over the last few years, and "hate" isn't the right word. You are probably the most ridiculed person. It seems that every few months they decide to stop mentioning you, because someone thinks that you do weird things (20 hour editing sprees, for example) just to get them to notice you, and that they are therefore "enabling" bad behavior. So they agree to stop mentioning you, until someone just can't stand it any more. And so the cycle repeats. But they don't hate you. And I can assure you that I don't hate you. I think of you as a friend. A weird one that occasionally needs to be reprimanded, but a friend. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 16:49, 4 March 2015 (EST)
:::I've done a little looking around at what's been going on at RW over the last few years, and "hate" isn't the right word. You are probably the most ridiculed person. It seems that every few months they decide to stop mentioning you, because someone thinks that you do weird things (20 hour editing sprees, for example) just to get them to notice you, and that they are therefore "enabling" bad behavior. So they agree to stop mentioning you, until someone just can't stand it any more. And so the cycle repeats. But they don't hate you. And I can assure you that I don't hate you. I think of you as a friend. A weird one that occasionally needs to be reprimanded, but a friend. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 16:49, 4 March 2015 (EST)
As far as me helping the atheist/agnostic woman and your insistence that it never happened, as Ripley said, "Believe it or not!". I will sleep very well tonight knowing that a crass and angry atheist angrily denies an event happened when I know for certain that it did! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:02, 4 March 2015 (EST)
As far as me helping the atheist/agnostic woman and your insistence that it never happened, as Ripley said, "Believe it or not!". I will sleep very well tonight knowing that a crass and angry atheist angrily denies an event happened when I know for certain that it did! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:02, 4 March 2015 (EST)
::::Your points: Firstly I would never call a female a c*nt, an exclusively male insult where I come from. Secondly Hitler built excellent roads and had an excellent animal rights record but he was still an evil SOB. Thirdly, of all the 100s of inane and insane articles you have written you ALWAYS point to the one article with slightly different style, a conscious effort of deceit by you, it did not work. Any expert in linguistics/writing/whatever would know with 100% certainly that all your articles, all of them are written by the same person, that is all
::::Your points: Firstly I would never call a female a c*nt, an exclusively male insult where I come from. Secondly Hitler built excellent roads and had an excellent animal rights record but he was still an evil SOB. Thirdly, of all the 100s of inane and insane articles you have written you ALWAYS point to the one article with slightly different style, a conscious effort of deceit by you, it did not work. Any expert in linguistics/writing/whatever would know with 100% certainly that all your articles, all of them are written by the same person, that is all. {{unsigned|GregorG}}
Your defense of your crass denigration of women was not impressive (why do atheists so often try to dodge responsibility for their actions). Second, I find it sad that you engaged in a Godwin! Third, feel free to run the respective articles through writing style analysis software or have a writing style expert examine the matter. I/we am/are confident that vindication will be mine/ours! Next, I have my doubts that hundreds of wiki articles were written through the User: Conservative account (liberal exaggeration? Never trust a leftist, militant atheist! Do not trust. Verify! Always, assume they are lying until proven otherwise as Mr. Beale says! :)[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2011/12/mailvox-undermining-atheism.html] ). Lastly, feel free to engage in [[last wordism]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:28, 4 March 2015 (EST)
Your defense of your crass denigration of women was not impressive (why do atheists so often try to dodge responsibility for their actions). Second, I find it sad that you engaged in a Godwin! Third, feel free to run the respective articles through writing style analysis software or have a writing style expert examine the matter. I/we am/are confident that vindication will be mine/ours! Next, I have my doubts that hundreds of wiki articles were written through the User: Conservative account (liberal exaggeration? Never trust a leftist, militant atheist! Do not trust. Verify! Always, assume they are lying until proven otherwise as Mr. Beale says! :)[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2011/12/mailvox-undermining-atheism.html] ). Lastly, feel free to engage in [[last wordism]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:28, 4 March 2015 (EST)
===SamHB weighs in===
@RicardoL: Nothing to say. He's a loser, and has been blocked.
@Cons: There is no need to reply to this guy. He's a loser.
*"you don't have the purest thoughts when it comes to gender relations" Uhh, right.
*"please explain why the footnoting style ...." Huh? What's that got to do with anything?
:Oh, I get it. You are using variations in your footnoting style to defend yourself against the accusation that you are just one person. There is no need to do that. First, RicardoL is a loser. Second, everyone knows that you are one person. I have read and enormous amount of your writing, and it is '''completely obvious''' that your writings are done by one person. There is no need to try to convince anyone that you are multiple people. It does not benefit you in any way at all. People don't get paid by the man-hour here.
*"Given your angry and crass post ..." Aside from his being a loser, there is no need to psychoanalyze him.
*"is not troubling to me" As well it shouldn't be.
*"I don't support feminism and I don't support the men's rights movement ..." Fine.
*"I think not citing authors due to not agreeing with all of their views" Fine. But I don't see what it has to do with anything RicardoL was saying. Rather than responding to him, why don't you write up your thoughts in a well-structured freestanding article? It would probably be quite interesting.
*"Beale" Who??? All too often you write as though to some small group of your friends who know all sorts of inside jokes and expressions. We don't. Please keep your audience in mind when you write.
*"As far as me helping the atheist/agnostic woman and your insistence that it never happened, as Ripley said, 'Believe it or not!'". I don't doubt for an instant that you helped this person the way you say. Ignore RicardoL.
@GregorG: "Firstly I would never call a female a c*nt, an exclusively male insult where I come from." What are you talking about? And why? In any case, it's good to know that you refrain from sexist insults.
*Hitler: What???
*Roads: What???
*Animal rights: What???
@myself: I'm taking it too seriously. The guy's a loser. I guess I take offense when people vomit all over my talk page.
@everyone: The discussion above is revolting. A couple of months ago I presented a sort of fanciful notion ("Material moved from the Community Portal", above) that Cons, AugustO, and EJamesW are visiting my "house" for a friendly chat. But the place is a mess. I'm going to have to have the carpeting steam-cleaned to remove the smell of vomit. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 00:12, 5 March 2015 (EST)