SkipCaptcha
12,693
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 77:
Line 77: − − == Blocking for foul username?????? == − − How about blocking for outrageous (one might say "rubbish" and "hideous") vandalism? People are getting awfully sloppy in their block reasons. I was about to chew Cons out over this issue. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 18:58, 15 March 2015 (EDT) − − :Sorry, I failed to read the full block reason. "Account may be recreated as a first name and last initial"??? Yeah, right!! [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 19:00, 15 March 2015 (EDT)
User talk:TheAmericanRedoubt (view source)
Revision as of 23:04, March 15, 2015
, 23:04, March 15, 2015Reverted edits by SamHB (talk) to last revision by TheAmericanRedoubt
I assume that you are following American news. So, when you add your "see also" sections to articles like [[Oregon]] or [[Arizona]], could you check whether the articles are up-to-date? Thanks. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 03:00, 20 February 2015 (EST)
I assume that you are following American news. So, when you add your "see also" sections to articles like [[Oregon]] or [[Arizona]], could you check whether the articles are up-to-date? Thanks. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 03:00, 20 February 2015 (EST)
:: Will do -- when I can or when I know about it. [[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 03:13, 20 February 2015 (EST)
:: Will do -- when I can or when I know about it. [[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 03:13, 20 February 2015 (EST)