Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hodgson v. Minnesota (view source)

Revision as of 00:43, May 16, 2015

161 bytes added ,  00:43, May 16, 2015
m
The ''Hodgson'' court upheld a judicial bypass provision that resulted in courts granting more than 99.5% of the abortion requests without notice to a parent.
Line 3: Line 3:  
Justice [[John Paul Stevens]] wrote the opinion for the 5-4 Court, joined by Justice [[Sandra Day O'Connor]] and the [[liberal]] wing of the Court.  Justice [[Anthony Kennedy]] dissented along with the [[conservative]] wing of the Court.
 
Justice [[John Paul Stevens]] wrote the opinion for the 5-4 Court, joined by Justice [[Sandra Day O'Connor]] and the [[liberal]] wing of the Court.  Justice [[Anthony Kennedy]] dissented along with the [[conservative]] wing of the Court.
   −
Justice Kennedy objected to how the Court majority interpreted an earlier abortion precedent, an approach he also took in his dissent in ''[[Stenberg v. Carhart]]'', in which Justice Kennedy objected to how the Court interpreted ''[[Planned Parenthood v. Casey]]''
+
Justice Kennedy objected to how the Court majority interpreted an earlier abortion precedent, an approach he also took in his dissent in ''[[Stenberg v. Carhart]]'', in which Justice Kennedy objected to how the Court interpreted ''[[Planned Parenthood v. Casey]]''.
 +
 
 +
The ''Hodgson'' court upheld a judicial bypass provision that resulted in courts granting more than 99.5% of the abortion requests without notice to a parent.
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[category:abortion]]
 
[[category:abortion]]
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,393

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1152939"

Navigation menu