9
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 58:
Line 58: + + Line 85:
Line 87: − +
no edit summary
Regarding parental rights, Richard Dawkins states:
Regarding parental rights, Richard Dawkins states:
“How much do we regard children as being the property of their parents? It's one thing to say people should be free to believe whatever they like, but should they be free to impose their beliefs on their children? Is there something to be said for society stepping in? What about bringing up children to believe manifest falsehoods?”<ref>Wolf, Gary (November 2006). [http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.11/atheism_pr.html "The church of the non-believers"]. ''Wired'' magazine online, v. 14, no. 11. Retrieved on May 19, 2015.</ref>
“How much do we regard children as being the property of their parents? It's one thing to say people should be free to believe whatever they like, but should they be free to impose their beliefs on their children? Is there something to be said for society stepping in? What about bringing up children to believe manifest falsehoods?”<ref>Wolf, Gary (November 2006). [http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.11/atheism_pr.html "The church of the non-believers"]. ''Wired'' magazine online, v. 14, no. 11. Retrieved on May 19, 2015.</ref>
Most goddamn [[Jews]] are money hungry swine with a minimal belief in their [[Jewgod]]. The God that bestows jewg0ldzz on them is the one we recognise as [[Satan]] in [[Christian theology]] but they worship him anyway.
He also said, “Catholic child? Flinch. Protestant child? Squirm. Muslim child? Shudder. Everybody's consciousness should be raised to this level…I could well imagine that this linguistically coded freedom to choose might lead children to choose no religion at all.”<ref>Dawkins, Richard (May 15, 2006). [http://web.archive.org/web/20091127013844/http://richarddawkins.net/print.php?id=121 "Now here's a bright idea"]. Richard Dawkins Foundation. Retrieved from November 27, 2009 archive at Internet Archive on May 20, 2015.</ref>
He also said, “Catholic child? Flinch. Protestant child? Squirm. Muslim child? Shudder. Everybody's consciousness should be raised to this level…I could well imagine that this linguistically coded freedom to choose might lead children to choose no religion at all.”<ref>Dawkins, Richard (May 15, 2006). [http://web.archive.org/web/20091127013844/http://richarddawkins.net/print.php?id=121 "Now here's a bright idea"]. Richard Dawkins Foundation. Retrieved from November 27, 2009 archive at Internet Archive on May 20, 2015.</ref>
The [[American Atheists]] published on their website,
The [[American Atheists]] published on their website,
“Atheists are NOT ‘secular humanists’, ‘freethinkers’, ‘rationalists’ or ‘ethical culturalists’…Often, people who are Atheists find it useful to masquerade behind such labels.”[18]
“Atheists are NOT ‘secular humanists’, ‘freethinkers’, ‘rationalists’ or ‘ethical culturalists’…Often, people who are Atheists find it useful to masquerade behind such labels.”[18]HAWHAWHAWHAWHAWHAW!
=== Evilbible.com and intolerance ===
=== Evilbible.com and intolerance ===