Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,947
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 62:
Line 62: + + +
→Consequences of dismissing the First Cause: anti-God philosophies
|quote=Pravá veda nikdy nestála proti Bohu.
|quote=Pravá veda nikdy nestála proti Bohu.
|language=Slovak}}</ref>|group=note}} and the first effect of not believing in God [here as the first cause] is that person is losing the [[common sense]] or according to É.L. Cammaerts starts believing in [[moral relativism|anything]].<ref>See notes in: [[Singularity]]</ref> The similar critique, published in the Spectator on 24 March 1860, was applied to [[Darwin]] by Adam Sedgwick who in his review of the [[The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection|Origin]] criticized Darwin's theory for unflinching [[materialism]] and for utterly repudiating final causes.<ref>ibid.</ref> The philosophical positions stemming from this repudiation eventually degenerated into [[scientism]] and attracted [[totalitarianism|totalitarian]] minds and adherents of radical anticlericalism who blindly sought to impose their own belief systems pertaining to [[morality]] and [[politics]].<ref name="Debré"/>
|language=Slovak}}</ref>|group=note}} and the first effect of not believing in God [here as the first cause] is that person is losing the [[common sense]] or according to É.L. Cammaerts starts believing in [[moral relativism|anything]].<ref>See notes in: [[Singularity]]</ref> The similar critique, published in the Spectator on 24 March 1860, was applied to [[Darwin]] by Adam Sedgwick who in his review of the [[The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection|Origin]] criticized Darwin's theory for unflinching [[materialism]] and for utterly repudiating final causes.<ref>ibid.</ref> The philosophical positions stemming from this repudiation eventually degenerated into [[scientism]] and attracted [[totalitarianism|totalitarian]] minds and adherents of radical anticlericalism who blindly sought to impose their own belief systems pertaining to [[morality]] and [[politics]].<ref name="Debré"/>
===Spread of anti-God philosophies===
In science, the downfall of Metaphysical anti-theistic ideas has been the lumping together of [[Operation science|operational]] and [[Origin science|origins science]]. The obvious limitations of [[historical science]] began to be ignored and anti-God philosophies such as [[evolutionism]] started to masquerade as science. Despite many profound weaknesses, [[Enlightenment ]] 'scientists' began to apply these philosophical ideas to the interpretation of the world in which we live.
Men insistently demanding a naturalistic account of origins caused many doubting God’s Word. [[Bible|Biblical]] authority was rejected ''a priori''<ref name="Ambler">{{cite web |title= Evolutionists on the Bible: Philosophical naturalists ‘explain’ the Bible |author= Marc Ambler |publisher= CMI |date=19 May 2015 |url=http://creation.com/evolution-on-bible |accessdate=31 May 2015}}</ref> and the two most notorious and blood-soaked political movements of the twentieth century, [[Nazism]] and [[Communism]], started their onset, building on this rejection and animating the idea of [[evolution]].<ref>{{cite book |title= Evolution's Fatal Fruit: How Darwin's Tree of Life Brought Death to Millions |author= Tom DeRosa |publisher= Coral Ridge Ministries Media, Incorporated|year=2006 |isbn=978-1-9296-2625-0 |pages=7-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xrkGPQAACAAJ |quote=...Nazism and Communism, both rejected God and were animated by idea of evolution.}}</ref> The confusion continues to present day with many unable to distinguish between [[empirical science]], and the philosophical [[naturalism]] underpinning so much speculation, especially about origins. These interpretations are believed as all amounting to the same thing, i.e. to the ''“Did God actually say?”'' Doubt in God’s Word that was first sown into minds of people by [[Satan]] back in the [[Garden of Eden]]<ref name="Ambler"/>.
== Notes ==
== Notes ==