589
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + +
no edit summary
The policy here is or at least should be equal time. Insert counterbalancing claims, but leave the scientific ones.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 20:06, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
The policy here is or at least should be equal time. Insert counterbalancing claims, but leave the scientific ones.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 20:06, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
:"Should be" doesn't cut it. I don't remember Andy saying that equal time is the rule. If he did, then he is contradicting the [[User:CPanel|Panel]]. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 20:09, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
:"Should be" doesn't cut it. I don't remember Andy saying that equal time is the rule. If he did, then he is contradicting the [[User:CPanel|Panel]]. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 20:09, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
My view is that as long as the science stays, it doesn't hurt to acknowledge that some people see it differently.--[[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 20:26, 18 April 2007 (EDT)